Page 3 of 3
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 2:44 am
by The Stir Fry Master
why should I not be concerned???
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 3:51 am
by richy
...........because the Plod target suppliers, not recipients.
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 5:21 am
by Phil McC
Richy we were involved in a very famous case about 14 years ago where a select few punters were raided on the strenght of their request for kiddy stuff. I wont go into all the details but requesting pornography is a criminal offence and their letters was enough for a judge to grant search warrants. 4 Got convicted including a teacher down in Wales.
Hope they are still banged up with bobo,
Unless you are playing with fire you won't get burned.
Phil McC
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 10:08 am
by jj
...and, I believe, Richy was expatiating the obvious, on the (not unnatural) assumption that you're aren't exactly the sharpest thorn on the rose-bush.
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 11:04 am
by richy
I really makes me fear for the future of the people in this country, jj, when one has to explain that my explanation was an explanation of the obvious. Thanks.
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 1:43 pm
by jj
.....it would have been a lot quicker just to have told him to fuck off.
But I thought that I'd already done that.
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 5:45 pm
by richy
Thanks, Phil.
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sat May 25, 2002 9:33 pm
by jj
......I'm sorry, would you care to explain that remark?
Re: why weren't we warned before? for JJ
Posted: Sun May 26, 2002 4:48 am
by richy
Ha! Ha! Very funny. I don't need to explain my remark to you, jj, as I'm confident you have already worked it out for yourself.