egafd.com

SID THE CYNIC wrote:

> But don't they tend to be owned by chavvy scummy bling wearing
> idiots, who call them Tyson etc. and who live on council
> estates.
> They like them as a status symbol of their 'hardness', and want
> them to be viscious and uncontrollable by anybody other than
> the owner.
> And wonder why they attack their kids.
>
> Terrible terrible shame that each year numeral kids get maulled
> by the famiy pet.


When I first hear of this, my first thought was that the owner would be a shaven headed, track suit wearing pretend hardman, living on a sink estate. Having just seen him on the news, I couldn't be more right.

Hi
Didnt Princess Anne's dog bite someone in a park? I seem to recall the Queen's corgis acting in a similar way in the past. I dont blame the dog, I blame the owners. These chav scum get everywhere don't they? The next time I see Princess Anne in a shell suit in Richmond Park, I'm running the other way.

On a serious note, you can't help having sympathy for the parents who have lost their little girl. But, for god's sake. why on earth leave it all night with a dangerous, banned dog at a time of year which is amongst the most freaky for dogs ie. fireworks going off all night? Even worse, the dog's violent behaviour had already resulted in a number of written and verbal complaints made about it.
Cheers
D

I think there's a show on TV in the next few weeks made just for people like him.

Keith Allen [my heart sinks already] takes a group of Tourettes- suffering hardcase Glaswegian teenagers on a Routemaster bus trip to France.

And no- I am not fucking joking.

Merde sainte!