Page 3 of 5
Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:47 pm
by Pervert
Well, I'm from a working class family, so it's not a class thing with me. I just find them ugly, whoever has them.
Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:34 pm
by tommy dickfingers
i really do not like tattoo's or piercings,but with a piercing you can always remove it.look at the girls a METART or look at east european girls and not many of them have tattoo's and they look better for it.
Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:56 pm
by Jonone
He had plenty of time to make the same observation about Dennis Rodman. Sexist as well as racist ?
Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:05 pm
by Jacques
warren zevon rip wrote:
> which is why you
> would have thought that some sort of temporary but long lasting
> tattoo/transfer would have been invented by now. (Perhaps it
> has)
Temptoo's - they last for about five years before fading away to nothing.
Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:09 pm
by Jacques
I think if they are done well i.e. good design and tattooist then they are fine.
Done badly i.e. fashion victim then not so good.
Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:12 pm
by Porn crackers
No
PC