Page 3 of 5

Re: Prescott

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:09 pm
by mrmcfister
The bloke is a total bluffer ..agreed!! Do you remember a few years ago when he smacked some twat in the mouth...how I wished the bloke had been a bit more of a pikey and floored the plonker...yea I know WZR..shouldnt do it but seeing the twat get back up minus his front teeth....priceless!!

Re: Prescott

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:13 pm
by Sam Slater
[quote]Fantastically well put, Sam, for once WZR has nothing to say.[/quote]

Jeeezus Wazza! At least warn me next time you're gonna throw compliments my way.......I mean..........I could have had a scolding hot drink in my hand when I clicked your reply!

I got the quote from Socrates wrong though..............never mind, he just put it more eloquently. !wink! !thumbsup!


Re: Prescott

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:31 pm
by Robches
"Of course, the difference is, if he was as unpopular as all that, surely someone else would have been voted in by now, whereas in the USSR, people had no choice."

Wasn't NuLabor re-elected with the resounding support of some 22% of the electorate?


Re: Prescott

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:57 pm
by Robches
"As I pointed out, according to the rules they were playing by, even in 2005 they did best. Doesn't suggest that the other bunch were very popular - LESS than 22%!"

But they still behave as if they had the support of 99% of the population. Tone gave the game away when he said he wanted NuLabor to be "nothing less than the political arm of the British people as a whole." The man is an authoritarian turd.


Re: Prescott

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:35 pm
by Pervert
Very well put, Sam. I suffer from the major liberal (small l) fault of assuming everyone is intelligent. I keep forgetting those who watch ITV, Big Brother and read the Scum. Apologies.