Page 3 of 9
Re: Guns and teens
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:03 pm
by jj
magoo wrote:
> The English police have voted "NO" to being armed. Why are they
> against the idea? Simple.....they know better than the little
> tossers who talk the talk but wont walk the walk
What does this mean exactly?
Re: Guns and teens
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:24 pm
by jj
...so we have a half-armed force? Isn't that the same as an armed one?
You shoot an unarmed [but armoured] beat-officer and 5 minutes later
armed officers arrive......
And since when do the police decide whether they're armed or not?
I thought [all recent evidence to the contrary, admittedly] that the Govt.
dictated policy?
Re: Guns and teens
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:33 pm
by jj
I see your meter is already reading "2/3 full". The weekend is here !!
Have one for me [I am currently nursing a sore throat and several
different strains of 'flu and the mere thought of alcohol doesn't thrill me
at all......].
I don't have a japseye- I think mine's South Korean, possibly Laotian.
Re: Guns and teens
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:48 pm
by Pervert
Nice Cole Porter reference, Benylin Boy
