egafd.com

Deuce Bigolo wrote:

> Maybe you'd like to define where old stops & new begins?

planeterotica wrote:

Well for me old is stuff i have seen before and new is stuff that i have never seen before even if its fifty years old !cool!!cool!!cool!

70sand 80s.

Deuce Bigolo wrote:

>>


IMHO, the rot started to set in during the latter part of the '90s.

These days I'd say that about 99.99% of modern porn just leaves me cold (echoing fludgeflaps' comments above).

- Eric

fudgeflaps wrote:

> In any argument of old vs new, be it porn, film or sport, the
> old generally wins due to 'characters', talent and class being
> replaced by production-line by-numbers blandness.
>

Very good points especially the above one.

For me though the spitting in porn these days is what makes me switch off.

Top totty (and in my opinion there are lots these days) seem to think (or at least the producers do) that seeing a young stunner gob adds to the attraction and makes it 'hard'.

It disgusts me when I see it done in the street, as I sure it does most people, so why it is suddenly viewed as erotic on film is beyond me.

Chav lifestyle seems to becoming more acceptable so I suppose Chav actions in porn are the natural consequence.

I am at a stage now were I don't even bother to click some models work if gobbing is part of their style.

eroticartist wrote:

> Do you prefer the new pornography or the old?

I prefer some of the older style porn whilst also prefering some of the new aspects of it.

Alice,
What about Behind the Green Door or Debbie Does Dallas?
Mike.

Lara,
If Rodox is not hard enough then what does "hard" mean?
Mike.

I wrote to the lovely Juliet Anderson many moons ago to ask about a film she did.

I was amazed to not just get a very nice and polite reply but also a lovely signed photo.

Porn from yesteryear or porn from these days, the fact remains that there are still, and have always been, rip-off merchants who are only interested in getting the punters money and swindling them!