Page 3 of 6
Re: having just had a look
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:45 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
extremely photogenic and smart
a couple of b/g performances,a handful of b/g photoshoots
Just enough to keep your interest
Re: having just had a look
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:36 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
All 4 scenes were done for suze.net,more art than porn IMHO
A walk through her yahoo groups might turn up something
Re: having just had a look
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:45 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
Happy hunting
more details here
Re: Girls on BGAFD homepage - stil relevant?
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:25 am
by randyandy
Think the site being a film database is what matters.
Katie is adorable but hasn't done enough films (if any?) to be on the front page.
A competition is in order...
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:06 am
by Cenobitez
How about with all the graphical people on here, the bgafd hold a competition to design a cover image ?
Then maybe have a rotate thru them weekly ? be good advertising for the creator and for the bgafd
Re: Girls on BGAFD homepage - stil relevant?
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:19 pm
by one eyed jack
Does it really matter that much?
Given how the industry is constantly evolving maybe they should change the face of the site every month but then what happens if a girl suddenly quits the biz and wants to quietly slip away into normalsville?
To what should the criteria be for a girl to get on the splash page? You could even say Michelle Thorne is missing off there too...and Adele Stephens or...well I could go on really.