Page 3 of 4

Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:36 am
by chatterji
So he's unelected.

Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:38 am
by Lizard
"Unless you are rich it is maddness to vote for the Tories. I've probably said this before but in Mrs Thatchers time as PM the Tories took 8 billion pounds from welfare spending and at the same time gave 8 billion pounds in tax cuts to the rich. The same will happen under Cameron.
One of the first things a Cameron government will try to do is to get rid of the minimum wage because paying workers too much is bad for company directors profits. We will then be back into the 80s situation where companies were paying ?1 an hour!"



What bollocks! firstly the minimum wage is enshrined in both UK and European law and as such cannot be changed. On the subject of Thatcher! are you stuck in some kind of time warp? she may as well be dead for all the influence she wields.......Let it go. today's politics are all about gaining the middle ground, it makes therefore little difference who is in power, just what policies they impliment, this bunch of cunts have introduced more stealth taxes than any other Government, they have robbed pension schemes, taken us into a War we cannot win, allowed crime to spiral to hieghts unknown before, they are the most worthless bunch of arsewipes this country has EVER had, led by a PM who the electorate didn,t even vote for, he's only there by default, he's a worthless piece of crap without a proper mandate to govern, but too cowerdly to call an election.
If you honestly think that by voting conservative at the next election will result in the British workforce recieving a minimum wage of ?1. You are deluded.


Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:45 am
by Lizard
Correct Chatterji, just as the others warren mention's they are were there by default, or if you like only elected by thier peers, not by the Electorate, when Labour came to power they were voted in exactly because of Blair being the Leader they would NEVER have got in power without him, have the electorate voted for Brown?....that will be a big fat fucking NO!
.


Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:20 pm
by Trumpton
The Tories won't win as they are too far behind in all the election polls. The best is probably a 'hung' parliament.


Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:31 pm
by Trumpton
What people forget is that the vast majority of "New" Labour policies are in fact "old" Conservative one's.

The inventors of "New" Labour just stole ideas and policies from the Tories and dressed them up as "new".

This meant the the Tories were 'naked' and have had to fluff and buff around for a decade trying to find different core values and policies.

They've had since '97 four different leaders' which indicates that they are in trouble with what they are attempting to achieve.


Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:11 pm
by colonel
Chatterji- Who elected:

Macmillan [Tory] in 1958

Home [Tory] in 1963

Major [Tory] in 1990?

Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:49 pm
by Lizard
Ah well, nothing wrong with being well hung.


Re: David Cameron PM in November?

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 6:08 pm
by andy at handiwork
Although one votes for ones constituency MP, the electorate are aware of who the leader is. A vote for your local MP/ candidate can be a vote for that leader.Thats one reason why I didn't vote for a very capable Labour guy last time in my constituency.