egafd.com

Isn't part of the problem the variability of the age of consent though, especially her in the UK? Those weird laws a few years back about who can and can't take photo's of 16 and 18 year olds. Doesn't it lead to confusion?

I remember in the early to mid 90's in the back of all the newspapers where the Private shops advertise there was f ilm available of an 'ugly freckled teenager aged 16' who had her 'parents consent'. What is that about? Surely it wasn't legal for 16 year olds to be in porn then? Who the hell was the actress and who the hell were the parents saying yes? Weird and confusing.

The age of consent is 18 - for porn.

Crofter wrote:

I find it quite funny how in the US a pornstar can effortlessly be portrayed as an innocent "barely legal" teen in one film and then in the next film she is a "Milf" ... oh how I laugh!!

Well given that MILF stands for Mums Id Like to F...engage in sexual congress with, it stands to reason that a MILF could even be a teenager these days for all the teen pregnancys kicking around.

But then MILF wouldnt be right if its a bloke the same age doing the act which also seems to be the case these days.

Thats when i laugh

I agree, OEJ.

I think MILF porn would be better recategorised as an 'age-difference' fetish (too much of a mouthful- OK, MILF will do), as it's premise is the older, more experienced female going for the inexperienced young guy.

Even though I feel 'age-difference' fetish is a term that applies, it is TOTALLY DIFFERENT from the age-difference thing in "Old Farts, Young Tarts", which is also a dffferent fetish entirely. The age of the female in both cases is the factor.

I hope I'm making sense. Probably not. !confused!

I think the term now for Older Milfs (or childess for that matter) is Cougar!!
I await the first actress to be in a barely legal type movie and then become Cougarised within a couple of months ... them darn Porn Producers must think we were born yesterday - no wonder Sullivan made a packet or two.