ATTN: MODS

[Ace]

You know the knobheads he's reffering to, I wish it was THEM who'd fuck off.
All the best Jacques, and thanks for your PC help in the past

[Officer Dibble]

"You know the knobheads he's referring to, I wish it was THEM who'd fuck off."

Well, checking the O/T posts this morning it seems like their leader has used up his final warning and won't be troubling us again. Isn't it strange that those who profess to be caring sharing paragons of morality and social concern frequently display character flaws - such as being mean, arrogant and spiteful - that are totally at odds with their 'new man' stance?

Maybe Jacques will now reconsider?





Officer Dibble







Officius Dibblus est amplus amor deus

[colonel]

Jacques will be sadly missed.

[Flat_Eric]

Officer Dibble wrote:

>>


I was going to refrain from commenting, Dibs, because generally I'm not a believer in criticising someone who's not there to defend themselves.

But that "certain poster's" last sustained attack on EA was beyond the pale (not to mention downright libellous), and the mods were dead right to ban said poster.

Oh ... and you forgot to include conceited and self-important in your list of adjectives !laugh!

- Eric

[Alex L]

"Isn't it strange that those who profess to be caring sharing paragons of morality and social concern frequently display character flaws - such as being mean, arrogant and spiteful - that are totally at odds with their 'new man' stance? "


Spot on, let's hope that this will now be a less mean place for anyone taking the trouble to post here.

[stripeysydney]

Aaaaaaah! Now I understand who the culprit is.....Jacque's going to be missed.

[Steve R]

Come and have a Jaffa Cake, Jacques.

I'll put the kettle on.

[Mike_CFC]

So long Jacques.It's a bit sad though how you allow other people's opinions to affect your personal opinion on whatever topics are being discussed on here.

Or are you just an attention seeker?

?50 says he'll be back within a week !thumbsup! !wink!

[crofter]

I don't think it is just somebodys opinion though, as every thread he participated in was either derailed by him, made to be about him or just turned into a confrontational debate which was not the intention of starting the thread.
This forum is all about opinions and not everybody has the same views so arguments are going to "kick off", but when you had WRZ & Chums disagreeing and mocking every view particular posters had it was becoming a bit too much for me and I had to speak out.
Good riddance I say - wonder what his little pet poodle will do with himself now??

[Pervert]

Well, I was missing for some time last night, came back to find deletions made and, as far as I can recall, our French friend had been annoyed at the rantings of EA apparently being held accountable to a different set of criteria to the rest of us. But I could very well be wrong---it has happened in the past, and I'm not frightened to own up when I get the wrong end of the stick.

"Leader," Dibbs? Oh yeah, there are dozens of disciples to the cult of Wazza, just waiting for him to lead us to the promised land. I was under the impression that I was an individual, able to make my own mind up on various subjects---but as you claim otherwise, I must be wrong.

Using your own argument, does that then make you the leader of the "hang 'em all, and send 'em back" brigade of knuckle-trailers that seem to see this place as a home from home from the BNP forum?