Page 3 of 8

Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star...

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:58 pm
by Lizard
I agree, it's too contrived, he could have whipped it away anytime, why, when that once happened to me I fucking maced the guy, then had a sherry.


Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star...

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:46 pm
by Sam Slater
Again, you're way, way off.

Anyone can commit a gay act without being gay. Do you think every female pornstar that has done g/g has to find other females attractive? Being gay is a sexual preference from within the mind, not the acts you commit.


Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star...

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:00 am
by sandie
Sam Slater wrote:

> Again, you're way, way off.
>
> Anyone can commit a gay act without being gay. Do you think
> every female pornstar that has done g/g has to find other
> females attractive? Being gay is a sexual preference from
> within the mind, not the acts you commit.
>
>
exactly what i was and still am going to say sam.
im not bi. i tell u lot i am so it sticks within the fantasy of porn. i am not gay for pay either as my first job was a g/g. i do it cos it adds some je ne sais que to my other wise boring life. i enjoy sex. i dont care if its with a man, woman, TS, hand, or toy.

maybe steve was just open (can exquate to warped in some peoples mind) enough to say im not attracted to guys but i see so many girls spunked on and it looks so hot i wonder what it feels like.
i KNOW he wouldnt be the only guy to think that.

on the other hand maybe he is boared of fanny and testing the water with cock now!


Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star......

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:14 am
by one eyed jack
How do we know that Steve isnt thinking afterwards:

"What the fuck have I just done!"

Its hard not to see Alices point on this but then its probably because we simply just dont understand it. Knowing you are being spattered in the face with some blokes DNA fresh from source is not the same as sword fighting but hten I can see Sams side too thatif your cock is in such close proximity to another of the same sex it can be considered a gay act. But does it make you gay or bi?

Interesting twist and maybe Steve is making a subliminal point.

The reason why a lot of guys struggle to get wood (and why producers dont like trying new guys) is because of this very same thing.

Some guys cant even get wood for a women with anotyher guy, clothed in the room.

This tells me a higher percentage of British males have issues or feel vulnerable when just merely naked with another guy around.

Europeans and americans generally dont have problems with this.


Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star......

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:21 am
by isabel ice
Terry...

Why does my name always get brought into it when something weird happens??? lol...

I have no clue about if that was meant to happen or not... however, I don't think anyone has mentioned that the other guy had his fist up his bum whilst doing the dp... not the most attractive of sights....

Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star...

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:29 am
by randyandy
Big John Studd wrote:

> I stole this video from an American forum.
>
> Everyone on there found it funny.
>
> On here it's turned into a debate over Steve Holmes being
> gay!!!

It's probably on huffers to Big John lol.

Alice will no doubt have his own thread now just dedicated to him !laugh!


Re: It's not always good to be a male porn star...

Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:26 am
by Sam Slater
[quote]You can commit a gay act without being gay, but you cannot withhout being bisexual.[/quote]

How does that work, logically, alice?

Let's clarify a few facts for you:

Straight = sexual attraction of the opposite sex.

Gay = sexual attraction of the same sex.

Bi = sexual attraction of both sexes.

Again: It's nothing to do with the acts we commit, but what we're sexually attracted by. You're viewing, and judging everything from the acts committed. I can guarantee you that if any gay/bisexual guy replied to this debate he'd confirm that his homosexuality is based on what he thinks about the same sex; it's about his lusts and desires, and the sexual acts are just a bi-product of those.

Any straight guy on here has a limit, or boundary on what they will or won't do. Just because Mr Holmes' boundaries are different to yours, it doesn't mean he finds men attractive.

Can you not think up a single, hypothetical scenario where you'd have to commit a homosexual act with another man? The conclusion wouldn't mean you're forever bisexual, would it?