egafd.com

Yep!!

Gladly, I never read newspapers.

Ha, not me I'm afraid. I've spent a lifetime making other people very rich indeed with my talents to produce scenes and stills that have always sold. Me I'm just a hired hand with nothing to show.

I hope they (whoever they are) are indeed reading this. Come and get me boys !

planeterotica wrote:


> They allready have that Peter, its called a mobile phone
> everyone now has one and you are being tracked 24/7 or maybe
> not ?
>
>

You can turn off that tracker, or leave it at home, or even send it on its own trip for mis-direction if you so wish. I'm talking about an implanted chip, always on, always with you, always reporting back.

I just want to know where the "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" gang draw the line and what they consider going too far, and why anyone who has a lesser threshold to state intrusion into their lawful activities is deemed a moaning minnie.

Quote

"This has to be one of the dumbest things I?ve heard in a long time. The UK has spent ?4.4 billion ($6.6bn US) on a controversial high-tech National Identity Card scheme for the whole country. But they forgot one thing. No police or border station, to say nothing of licensing and job centers, has a machine capable of reading the damn things.

Incredibly, they neglected to include in the budget the absolutely necessary counterpart to the card: the card reader. Like an inexperienced shopper who buys a digital camera but not a computer to view the pictures on, they are now in possession of a far-reaching and complete ID tracking solution that they can in no way use. What a boondoggle!

The official word is that the reader rollout may cost taxpayer money (brilliant, Sherlock) and is not really being pursued that actively. While it would make sense to get a few IDs out there first and then follow up with the readers after six months, perhaps, that was not at all included in the budget and in fact the readers? manufacturers haven?t been convinced it?s worth their while to make the things."

And you are both better for it, and a victim of this witch-hunt, Dave. Sorry about that.

20% of all the world's CCTV cameras are in the UK, which is ridiculous. Newcastle Upon Tyne (pop 275,000) has more CCTV cameras than New York (pop 19.5 Million). They want to bring in a Surveillance Society / Police State in the UK, because we have low-grade/corrupt politicians and police and an undereducated population so it's easy for them to get away with fooling people into thinking it's the way things should be - in fact a lot of people want more of a clamp down, mainly because they're brainwashed.

I am 'chipped' in the arse and the neck, so I cant go anywhere without the Governments knowledge, for this, I am extremely gratefull to this current bunch.....



































Of CUNTS.

Yep. We've made mistakes like that too here as well therefor delaying anything that would hurt, harm, radiate, scan, X-ray etc, us into believeing it would be good for us.