JRPornstar wrote:
> 'J-C de Menezes, and about another
> twenty recent cases. '
>
> Still a gross assumption, if Menezes hadn't ran, he wouldn't
> have been shot. It is unfortunate, but a sign of the times we
> live in, that he ran at the wrong time, at the wrong place and
> especially on the wrong day.
Are you completely ingnorant? De Menezes didn't run anywhere, he was sat on the tube train when he was shot without warning. Try reading a paper or watching the news sometime. If the cops had mistaken you for a terrorist, they would have killed you too where you sat, without warning. Comfortable with that are we?
Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
What's your measure of 'poorly paid' ? Who are you comparing them to ?
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Argumentative aren't you?
How about nurses?
How about nurses?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
JRPornstar wrote:
> The matter of warnings given is a matter of debate if you have read
> the court transcripts.
I have, IN FULL; and I rather suspect you haven't.
And the judge's summary ought to have given you pause for thought.
> The matter of warnings given is a matter of debate if you have read
> the court transcripts.
I have, IN FULL; and I rather suspect you haven't.
And the judge's summary ought to have given you pause for thought.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Those who fail to learn the lessons of history.....
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."