Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Robches
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Post by Robches »

JRPornstar wrote:

> 'J-C de Menezes, and about another
> twenty recent cases. '
>
> Still a gross assumption, if Menezes hadn't ran, he wouldn't
> have been shot. It is unfortunate, but a sign of the times we
> live in, that he ran at the wrong time, at the wrong place and
> especially on the wrong day.

Are you completely ingnorant? De Menezes didn't run anywhere, he was sat on the tube train when he was shot without warning. Try reading a paper or watching the news sometime. If the cops had mistaken you for a terrorist, they would have killed you too where you sat, without warning. Comfortable with that are we?
Jonone
Posts: 2939
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Post by Jonone »

What's your measure of 'poorly paid' ? Who are you comparing them to ?
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Post by jj »

Argumentative aren't you?

How about nurses?

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Post by jj »

JRPornstar wrote:

> The matter of warnings given is a matter of debate if you have read
> the court transcripts.

I have, IN FULL; and I rather suspect you haven't.
And the judge's summary ought to have given you pause for thought.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Post by jj »

Those who fail to learn the lessons of history.....

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Locked