Page 3 of 7

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:07 am
by Robches
JRPornstar wrote:

> 'J-C de Menezes, and about another
> twenty recent cases. '
>
> Still a gross assumption, if Menezes hadn't ran, he wouldn't
> have been shot. It is unfortunate, but a sign of the times we
> live in, that he ran at the wrong time, at the wrong place and
> especially on the wrong day.

Are you completely ingnorant? De Menezes didn't run anywhere, he was sat on the tube train when he was shot without warning. Try reading a paper or watching the news sometime. If the cops had mistaken you for a terrorist, they would have killed you too where you sat, without warning. Comfortable with that are we?

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:12 am
by Jonone
What's your measure of 'poorly paid' ? Who are you comparing them to ?

Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:06 pm
by jj
Argumentative aren't you?

How about nurses?


Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:08 pm
by jj
JRPornstar wrote:

> The matter of warnings given is a matter of debate if you have read
> the court transcripts.

I have, IN FULL; and I rather suspect you haven't.
And the judge's summary ought to have given you pause for thought.


Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:10 pm
by jj
Those who fail to learn the lessons of history.....