Page 3 of 6

Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:16 pm
by jj
Sam Slater wrote:
> don't use any of the social networking sites (apart from
> twitter) but I'm not in the least surprised that they're
> popular.

It's the same mystery as Jeremy Kyle's popularity : -)


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:17 pm
by Sam Slater
Oh come on, jj! I've seen the exchanges between you and Liz on here over the years, remember?! !laugh!


Re: Jesse writes....

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:17 pm
by jj
This week, Oi 'ave mostly bin eating- raddichio.


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:18 pm
by jj
Sam Slater wrote:
> I could go on......and on........and on.

....yes, don't you just : -)


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:18 pm
by Sam Slater
Jeremy Kyle is popular? I think people just tune in hoping someone's going to give him a good hiding at some point.


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:19 pm
by Sam Slater
I'm a man of my word !happy!


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:20 pm
by jj
max_tranmere wrote:
> As this is a porn forum...

Strctly speaking, it isn't.
We may visit here because of the bgafd Big Forum, but it's not
called 'O/T' for nothing.


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:20 pm
by jj
... and sometimes we could do with some of his long silences : -)


Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:23 pm
by jj
Sam Slater wrote:
> No, but going on and on about every aspect of her being (her
> breasts, her pussy, her 'half bush', her comments during a
> scene, her facial expressions and even her fucking singing with
> a hairbrush on youtube......I mean, for fucks sake) IS slightly
> strange.
Not at all; there's little enough beauty in the world, without denying
people the opportunity to occasionally celebrate it.


> Most people just post things like "My favourite boobs are....."
> and "My favourite pornstar is....
Which are utterly banal, agreed.


> What do we get out of even having this argument?
... it wasn't an argument until you made it one : -)