egafd.com

Again, we've been through this on more than one occasion before. The Labour Party won the last general election, not Tony Blair. You seem to have a predisposed idea of something and then stick to it regardless of fact. I'm not saying you have to take my word for it, you can go investigate the truth of what I say for yourself.

There must be many things you can point to that would aid in your attacks on Gordon Brown without resorting to invalid jibes and using his disability to insult him.

At least you've not hinted that he be assassinated by some traumatised soldier with a gun handy, yet, which is something I suppose, but there's still time isn't there?

Dick Moby wrote:

> Most of us up here can't stand the twat, that's why we let you
> have him.
> Before you ask ---- we don't accept returns without the
> original receipt and in the original packaging
> You don't actually think he will take any responsibility, not
> with those sloping shoulders of his.

planeterotica wrote:

Well we dont fucking want him here in England either, maybe the Welsh or the Irish would adopt him, any offers !sadbanana!

Great minds think alike !wink!

I think that we shall find-in the coming days-that some 'deals' have been done between Libya and the British and Scottish governments.In the Arab world there is the principal of ''blood money''

"In an interview with a Libyan station, Mr Islam reportedly claimed that the Megrahi issue had been raised repeatedly by Britain's former prime minister Tony Blair.

"In all commercial contracts, for oil and gas with Britain, (Megrahi) was always on the negotiating table," Mr Islam said told Libya's Al Mutawassit channel.

Mr Blair visited Libya in May 2007, during which UK energy giant BP signed a $900m (?540m) exploration deal.

Source: bbc.co.uk

You have to be aware of the source of such claims. Presently they're neither true or false but indeterminate. If they turn out to be 'true' or valid, hands up who's going to be surprised ?

Surely you mean north sea oil.

Scots territorial waters.
All else was a legal finagle.

There are several [many?] posters here of Scottish descent and/
or residence. They have a legitimate interest in the way their
country is run.
What's wrong with that?

Sam Slater wrote:
> Yawn. Give me the name of the last PM the British public voted
> for.


But wasn't it you who was arguing the other day that the electorate
votes for a party and policies, rather than a PM?

I was waiting for something like this to surface.

Wow- I am SO shocked...........