cc hungarians

[jj]

From that single, undated, uncontextualised profile, I'd have
put the probability of it being of I [2] at around the 99% mark.
Is it possible to add approximate dates to your future postings
[I've given up on trying for multiple shots] ?

[Rob4]

it would be too time consuming to add appearance dates to the templates now but if you go to this page at VEF (post #78):

you can down load the CC Mag timeline (credit cccmagfan).

sorry for not doing multiple shots but i'm having quite a high hit rate with the single shots that i sometimes find it hard to keep updating the identified list.
once i have a complete set of id sheets then i will start concentrating on particular models and post multiple views/expressions.

[jj]

Rob4 wrote:
> it would be too time consuming ...,,you can down load the
> CC Mag timeline
If I, er, get time [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]
It was more that I was a little irked that VEF visitors seemed to
have been provided with [or had access to] info on these pics
that egafd contributors hadn't.... and I'm sure you've seen my
frequent apoplectic soapbox rants here about those who hold back
potentially crucial info [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/oldie.gif[/img]

> once i have a complete set of id sheets then i will start
> concentrating on particular models and post multiple
> views/expressions.
Fair enough- time is at a premium for us all.

[Rob4]

point taken - and i don't mind getting a flea in the ear from someone as helpful as yourself.

the id sheets are an informational compromise to get as many models identified as possible enabling a more detailed exam of those that are difficult to find.

[jj]

...just be grateful the 'JJ sheets' have never been published.
I'd be posting them from now till the end of Time [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]

[Rob4]

don't laugh - i worked out that at the speed the cc website publishes the sets that this project will last at least 8 years - hope you still here in 2017!
!oldie!

[jj]

I'll still be doing the Private write-ups in 2017.
Possibly via a ouija-board : -)

[corona]

126 is deff not Debbie van Gils

[Tederoni2]

79h, again doubtful. Margot Kidney?
YES!

[Rob4]

thanks but already identified