egafd.com

From that single, undated, uncontextualised profile, I'd have
put the probability of it being of I [2] at around the 99% mark.
Is it possible to add approximate dates to your future postings
[I've given up on trying for multiple shots] ?

it would be too time consuming to add appearance dates to the templates now but if you go to this page at VEF (post #78):

you can down load the CC Mag timeline (credit cccmagfan).

sorry for not doing multiple shots but i'm having quite a high hit rate with the single shots that i sometimes find it hard to keep updating the identified list.
once i have a complete set of id sheets then i will start concentrating on particular models and post multiple views/expressions.

Rob4 wrote:
> it would be too time consuming ...,,you can down load the
> CC Mag timeline
If I, er, get time [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]
It was more that I was a little irked that VEF visitors seemed to
have been provided with [or had access to] info on these pics
that egafd contributors hadn't.... and I'm sure you've seen my
frequent apoplectic soapbox rants here about those who hold back
potentially crucial info [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/oldie.gif[/img]

> once i have a complete set of id sheets then i will start
> concentrating on particular models and post multiple
> views/expressions.
Fair enough- time is at a premium for us all.

point taken - and i don't mind getting a flea in the ear from someone as helpful as yourself.

the id sheets are an informational compromise to get as many models identified as possible enabling a more detailed exam of those that are difficult to find.

...just be grateful the 'JJ sheets' have never been published.
I'd be posting them from now till the end of Time [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]

don't laugh - i worked out that at the speed the cc website publishes the sets that this project will last at least 8 years - hope you still here in 2017!
!oldie!

I'll still be doing the Private write-ups in 2017.
Possibly via a ouija-board : -)

126 is deff not Debbie van Gils

79h, again doubtful. Margot Kidney?
YES!

thanks but already identified