egafd.com

From what Woodman says, that's not what he is about.

He isn't fake tanned, muscle bound, model looks, waxed with a huge cock.

He is the opposite, pale, porky, hairy, average looking with a small penis.

He claims, this is what makes him successful, as that?s what woman want to see. Maybe he is correct, maybe he is incorrect. He has his audience, and has got it on with more than most. 4000+ at the last count.

He claims to have hit hard times lately, as his films are being spread illegally via Rapidshare etc. This may cause him to quit.

Yes, R.Jeremy says the same things about himself.
The girls are all dying to be fucked by him! That seems to be their collective mantra.
When you are a certain "celebrity" in porn you may get things that are not readily available to the normal Joe out there. You have access to cash, locales, people, that are perhaps a bit out of the ordinary.
And if you openly advertise that you are a porn movie director who can "improve" your CV and make a newbie model a little more famous (and improve her bank account, and take her to some exotic location to boot, all expenses paid), and open up your wallet, yes those lovely ladies will easily pry apart those lovely lips and legs to you.
Whether those girls that you succeded to fuck did it because you think you are so "irresistible", "charming" and "studly" or because of the other factors, well then that is the illusion you will have to live with. To actual live and believe the lie, that takes someone who lacks a certain level of humility and inner soul introspection.
This is not to say that in real life PW and the others we have mentioend, may not have a certain charm, and probably would be able to bag a few of those ladies perhaps through their own personal efforts. But I will bet you it would not be even a small percentage of the actual figures.
Perhaps PW should frankly discuss what led to his departure from Private as well as Hustler, and I would love to hear the response from both these outfits.
On a final note, there are actual people out there who are illegally downloading his "casting" stuff?

corona wrote:
> From what Woodman says, that's not what he is about.
Well, he could hardly say otherwise : -)
> He isn't fake tanned, muscle bound, model looks, waxed with a huge cock.
Having a real tan or none; flabby muscles or buffed ones; balding or not; and
the size of perf's schlong don't much matter to me- all I ask is that the
males not be totally repulsive. Woodman fails on this count. He might [although
I doubt it] be a 'great shag'- but his method of filming doesn't allow the
viewer to form any clear impression about that. He has forgotten that porn
is for the viewer, not the performer/s- and that is both unforgiveable, and
bad business.
I still watch and enjoy his Private 'classics' [despite the tiresomely
aspirational context ["only the rich get laid"] and the cheesy Pan-Am grins]-
but I simply can't abide these egotistical Ed Powers-like excursions.


> He claims, this is what makes him successful, as that?s what
> woman want to see.
He can 'claim' anything. I'm sure women love watching other women being casually
abused [and I think it's the casual nature of it that offends me the most],
in a language they barely understand; and I'm sure they have said so frequently,
and in a statistically-verifiable fashion : -).
Besides which, it's bullshit. Women don't buy [or get their BFs to buy] enough
porn to keep him in condoms for a week. The male audience is where the money
is.


> He claims to have hit hard times lately, as his films are being
> spread illegally via Rapidshare etc.
I suspect his 'style' has more to do with any loss of business than
file-stealers.

> This may cause him to quit.
I'm devastated : -)

Everything is downloaded & distributed thesedays thesedays but lets be honest its not because its great porn its because its content that earns them dollars from the plethora of cashhosts

Exclusivity is about the only real reason the series is collected

Even those that have gone on to do other work..
they rarely if ever look that amateurish ever again

If you think PW is bad try the Fiona cooper CSB series on for size
Makes Woodman look like Rocco

Yes, I'll concede that point: Phil Sutcliffe is far more repulsive than Woodman.

I see your point. Woodman is out for himself at all times. He gets to go with many girls and profit from it. A win win situation for him. The type of girls he goes for tend to be from poor places, and they view him as a possible way into the porn industry. I doubt many of them, once they have been with Woodman, further their porno career.

Fiona Cooper is a man ?

You gotta post a picture

..maybe him and Woodman could get together and become the ugly twins with small cocks.

A well known fact...been discussed on bgafd numerous times
you might not like what you read because by all accounts he aint that nice a guy....far worse than woodman could ever be considered

In the dick that wont rise stakes he is king



here he is in all his glory with laura turner & michelle wright

[IMG]http://thumbnails42.imagebam.com/17554/721035175535353.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails55.imagebam.com/17554/381ad0175535354.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails31.imagebam.com/17554/e79f13175535356.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img269.imagevenue.com/loc337/th_12481_CSB_25_3_123_337lo.jpg[/IMG]

I just lost my lunch.
After Ed Powers, R. Jeremy, R.M., PW, M. Hardcore, I thought there was nothing else to see.
How much does he pay to abuse these nubile girls?