egafd.com

Johray1 wrote:
> I understand it is about time to keep some egafd-sabbath in
> terms of reviews etc...

I've been giving it some thought... I'd suggest a rule-of-thumb, as follows:
if there are more than four unThanked (i.e. unprocessed) threads, hold off
posting any new stuff for a day or three. That will cover me for those weeks
when I'm 'doing the day job' and also allow some 'me time' to add stuff from
my personal mountain [aka the Backlog Himalayas].

JJ > I've been giving it some thought... I'd suggest a rule-of-thumb, as follows:
if there are more than four unThanked (i.e. unprocessed) threads, hold off
posting any new stuff for a day or three. That will cover me for those weeks
when I'm 'doing the day job' and also allow some 'me time' to add stuff from
my personal mountain [aka the Backlog Himalayas].
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Sounds very reasonable... even more as I am sure any contribution is given with
the best intentions... but, that will not necessarily make it easier for you... not at all... !cigar!

So, I will enter this one I talked about and then I will do my best to keep track of
previously "un-actioned" threads, if I feel like having to contribute something!

Thx for your reply and may it keep the headaches away! !party!

jj wrote:
>>if there are more than four unThanked...


Only the additional infos for "Auf's Kreuz gelegt von geilen Teenies"
from this post B?se M?sen 12 and AKgvgT and
Strassenflirts 58: add info and corrections
are unprocessed at the moment.


Hehe, so there are two slots available:-)
That means: The double-act must strike again! !grin!



jj wrote:
>>hold off posting any new stuff..

What do you mean with new stuff? Only new films, which aren't listed
or additions/corrections also?

The easiest way (as you probably already know) to track additions is via
the Updates tab.

deezer wrote:
> Only the additional infos for "Auf's Kreuz gelegt von geilen Teenies"
I've "taken ownership" of that, so it won't count. Those Magmas require a
LOT of work and I've had to temnporarily shelve work on them - another
reason why I'm anxious not to get overloaded with forum stuff.
Remember that a couple of years back the forum often used to lag over
a year or more behind - a situation to which I contributed a great deal,
to my shame; and which stands as a tribute to Alec's stoicism and hard work
during that period. But we're not anxious to return to those days - BTW,
one of the surest signs that I'm slightly 'under the cosh' will be when I
hyperlink a review rather than add it wholesale to the db - which IIRC I
did do just recently.


> What do you mean with new stuff? Only new films, which
> aren't listed or additions/corrections also?
I hoped common-sense would make it obvious.... small posts (a few pics or
info which I can easily add straight off) are fine. But as for threads with new
titles - four or fewer, please - and bear in mind, these often tend to snowball
and get very complex - especially when you are 'playing a duet' : -) So if
there's a lot of cross-referencing involved (to other threads/titles stc.); or
the material's outside my comfort-zone (say, 1993-2004) the processing-time
will be lengthened considerably.