egafd.com

On the 7th June 2007, Lolly posted on this website on this issue (a thread I found at the top of the list having searched for "Lolly")



The argument that she should have shut down the site until it restarted (or at least not continued to collect subscriptions) could be made, but I think perhaps you should cut her a little slack? As I'm not a member of her site I can't say for sure, but I'm fairly sure if she posted here, she will have posted there too...

and this one too

Lolly received a lot of stick at the time some constructive but sadly some not.

The later I understand has unfortunately stopped her from making posts here.

Trumpton wrote:


> It was Lolly's site insofar as it had the name 'Lolly Badcock'
> as the title. It featured pictures and downloadable movies of
> Lolly Badcock. There were forums in which a Lolly Badcock
> posted.
>

Don't forget Lolly also promoted the site when it originally started and returned to promote it again after her personal problems with her partner.

As far as I understand she sadly no longer posts here because a few idiots didn't just criticize the site they also went other the top and I for one don't blame her.

They also started to rant on about each other and the thread became an obnoxious slanging match for and against.

All I'm going to say here is Lolly personally is a really nice lady.

Kind Wishes,

Stormchild69

randyandy wrote:

> Don't forget Lolly also promoted the site when it originally
> started and returned to promote it again after her personal
> problems with her partner.

Did Lolly personally promote her site?

> As far as I understand she sadly no longer posts here because a
> few idiots didn't just criticize the site they also went other
> the top and I for one don't blame her.

It's ridiculous to criticise or blame Ms. Badcock personally.

> They also started to rant on about each other and the thread
> became an obnoxious slanging match for and against.

Was Lolly Badcock involved in this?

Doesn't matter. The guys behind the websites encourage the girls to promote their sites because both parties get more money.

That's if the girl sees any money.

Promoting the site doesn't mean you're running and managing it.

I tyhink she had a few personal problems and took some time out. So thats why it hasnt been updated. But i could be wrong

Trumpton wrote:

> randyandy wrote:
>
> > Don't forget Lolly also promoted the site when it originally
> > started and returned to promote it again after her personal
> > problems with her partner.
>
> Did Lolly personally promote her site?
>
> > As far as I understand she sadly no longer posts here because
> a
> > few idiots didn't just criticize the site they also went
> other
> > the top and I for one don't blame her.
>
> It's ridiculous to criticise or blame Ms. Badcock personally.
>
> > They also started to rant on about each other and the thread
> > became an obnoxious slanging match for and against.
>
> Was Lolly Badcock involved in this?
>
>


Q1. Yes use search or if not it was the same 'fat greasy bloke' who had been using Lolly's nick throughout her career to make other posts here.
Statement 1. BOLLOCKS
Q2. Can't remember exactly what was said and care even less although do remember Lolly (or the fat greasy bloke) asking for sympathy and apologizing for the site at the time. If I recall Lolly (or the fat greasy bloke) stopped posting once the slanging match started.


Just for info don't attempt to rope me into the same style of debate that happened last time. The subject is now closed.

Not all girls have a fat greasy bloke running their website. I've been running mine on my own since 2003, and do my own editing and web design, and everything else that comes with a member site. The only help I get is from my Husband who takes my photos and records my videos. And he occassionally helps me come up with new pervy ideas for the site too.

There are still single girl sites out there that are run by the girl, they are just harder to find, but they do exist! xx