egafd.com

Well, first, I wasn't actually aware I wouldn't be allowed to name the model in question - eventually - when I originally made my post.

Second, as I wrote previously, I was hoping there was a very slim chance that perhaps the lady in question was unable to receive her email for whatever reason and was genuinely unware of the situation - I included enough information for my identity to be obvious to her. My intention was to allow the model every chance of putting things right (as far as I am concerned, of course).

Third, if people with a decent track record of posting on here wish to know, I am perfectly content with getting in touch with them to let them know. No offence, but that would presently preclude you and your 4 posts on here. I was going to reference the recent appearance of a journalist's assistant on here as an example of someone I wouldn't want to divulge any information to but I see one of your posts is already in that thread.

I do find it curious that you shoud choose to write 'scam' in your query as well; as the lady's identity is not known I was wondering why you would do that? You know nothing of the situation other than what I have written on here.

Lastly, if you read the Posting Guidelines for this site, making the type of post you refer to would require me to post a email address within the body of the message itself; the profile email is not adequate under the BGAFD rules.

Fair points, Tim Nice, and I am not looking to become involved in a war of words with you.

However, I'd just like to address your comment about my intentionally dropping enough information in this thread to identify the model - what I actually did was highlight a very well-known producer, in whose films the lady has featured in, to illustrate the fact that she is not a less well-known lady but rather one with quite an established reputation. That was in answer to videokim's suggestion that I would be best advised sticking with more well known models.

To be honest, I'm not actually sure that the director's name was not removed for another reason that I am unaware of. The director has made so many well-known films, using plenty of models who actively post on here, that it would not help in indentifying the model at all, really, I thought.

Other than the above, I have done nothing to reveal the identity of the model, and you initially asked why I had not included my email address with relation to the 'scam' post I made.

I've dealt with enough models previously to understand that escrow payment would not be necessary and I could rely on their professionalism etc. to produce the film. Perhaps I have simpy been foolish but lucky up until this event? If you can arrange something suitable if you ever decide to make such a purchase though, that is a good idea.

the problem with adultworks is, its too slow, and the site feels overloaded.

Hello Kojak.

No, the model has not made any attempt to contact me, unfortunately.

Thanks also for your offer to provide recommendations - I do know there are many reputable ladies out there and can personally vouch for Sandie Caine and Wendy Taylor, to name but two (that are still working), and I am sure that there are many more, including the ladies mentioned in this thread previousy.

While I am writing, I would also like to say that, contrary to Tim Nice's assumption, my previous post was not edited because I had attempted to reveal the identity of the model in question by 'dropping information in this thread' - BGAFD's admin confirmed that the name I wrote (a director) was the problem, and one which I certainly was not aware of, for what it is worth.