Page 3 of 15

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:29 pm
by Angel Long
Magoo,

Thanks ever so much. I can tell you I'm pretty choked at the thought of having to leave the biz. This is my perfect job and am really annoyed and angry that because I take care in my job and life that I may feel that I need to leave the indusrty due to some unreponible girls who feel that they don't need to repect other peoples lives and also themselves!! I've been crying at the fact my whole career that I've worked my arse off for may just be over and certainly not thru my choice.

Drastic changes are needed in the English porn biz for every ones sake

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:35 pm
by magoo
Well, to be frank- you should have looked well into the possiblities of adversity. What did you expect from such a loose industry?

Get out when you can if you have any doubts. Good luck in the future.

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:36 pm
by woodgnome
not all is sweetness and light over the pond:




Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:40 pm
by vila
Point taken - hadn't occurred to me before. It's probably only a slim chance, but the risk isn't worth taking, however long the odds.


Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:40 pm
by magoo
JJ I am shocked at your remark. Would you feel happy having unprotected sex with someone who had taken hundreds of facial cumshots from untested strangers? No I thought not.

Many fans might tell Angel its all safe because they dont want her to leave the business. I would feel guilty if I put my own masturbatory pleasures before the safety of a young woman with her whole life ahead of her. If I said "oh please dont leave Angel cos I like wanking over your films" and she caught HIV I would feel like a right selfish cunt.

And regarding occupational risks like you and Matt mentioned. Everyone takes precautions. Drivers wear seatbelts, police wear body armour, fishermen use lifejackets, construction workers wear hardhats, rail workers wear vests and use detonating caps etc etc. All jobs aim to minimize risks hence the use of detonators to warn track workers of a risk. All Angel is asking for is a safe-ish system of work. And if the industry cant give her that then she is right to reconsider her future. These girls who do untested bukkake are putting sensible performers like Angel at unneccessary risk.

If your boss said to you he was taking away your yellow vest and insisted you inspect the tracks for ten minutes each morning on a green signal youd be pissed off.

Shylock is right. The UK industry needs to sort itself out on this issue or all the girls with brains will leave.

magoo

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:44 pm
by magoo
I didnt post that last remark above this one. Someone else using my name.

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:45 pm
by P Simon
So, can I call you Frank?.......
You can call Him Al, if that's OK
.........

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:49 pm
by magoo
JJ I doubt its you who just posted above using my name. But whoever it is can you please not do it. I never said the industry was loose. And I certainly would not say that she should have expected it. I have more manners.

And your ISP is logged when you post so the moderators know who you are.

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:52 pm
by jj Berk 2
Not me, ole son...I did it the other day (for which, after thinking about it, I humbly apologise....)......so this is some other berk.

Re: Dililema

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:59 pm
by jj
Isn't there a bit of hypocrisy here?
Not least from Magoo and Woodgnome............