egafd.com

I htink whatyu say makes sense BB but I cant help but feel this exploits the need for control and proit by wy of licensng that often gets criticised

A I see it, people make a conscious decision to participate. If I was the organiser I'd be looking at getting these reckless people to sign a waiver absolving them from responsibility.

Its like me organising a Jump Under The Bus contest for a million quid and everyone getting mad at me when idiots get themselves killed jumping under the bus

I dont blame the organisers at all. Theyre providing an event that people ar consenting to by attending. I blame the participants for being idiots willing to risk themselves in this way.

I wonder how many escorts get asked todo bareback and owo? The ones that say no I bet are made short shrift of but when they are told its ok "I havent got anyhting" the escort could reply...."Yes but what makes you think I havent?"

I wanna shag hot chicks too but I dont wanna suffer from the clap doing so. Not many people think that way. Thats why so people have died from AIDS. Ignorance is a killer

Germany isn't the only country guilty of bareback parties, Holland, France, Spain, UK & Scotland have their share of them also & perhaps lots more in the rest of Europe & the world.

Swinging clubs (not organised by them) sometimes have events which include bareback (condoms are used by the people with more than 1 brain cell) & a certain club in Dagenham, Essex has 4-5 bareback parties a week with various girls hosting it.

The figures alone for bareback parties the UK is shocking & its only the really desperate or the girls who want to be known quickly that stoop that low...the average escort is a 1000% safer as they get tested & use condoms & would regard porn as a risky profession with good reason.

THE LAW should recognise that the organiser is the guilty party and the participants only guilty by association. You don't arrest the drug user and let the dealer go free. The dealer is the guiltiest. Get rid of him and the users have no drugs to use. It's also more practical to go after the organisers since they are few in number.
If you were an organiser of such events no doubt you'd be very successful in which case you get to choose what wallpaper you'd like in your cell.

I agree that escorting is safer than porn modelling. I read somewhere that the incidence of venereal diseases among escorts in London is less than 5%, but among women in the general population in London it's around 11%.

Not denying bareback parties aren't everywhere, but Germany is by far the most significant country in Europe for such parties.

Porn as changed over the years & the small amount of work girls get from it now is not enough to live on for most, ban the normal party girl who uses condoms & is tested or the escort who again practices safe sex & the industry is over as we know it.

Its the people doing bareback in porn films & then at parties who are the problems...totally different area's, people are already wary of high risk people & word gets around.

People attending a sex party must know in their own mind its not 100% safe...bit like hang gliding or paint balling there will be risks.

The problem we have in the UK is that filmed parties are totally legal compared to paid swinging parties which are classed as prostitution, police friends were explaining councils try their hardest to close paid swinging parties & sex parties except when a camera is being used as its then a film & within the law.