Re: Technical
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2002 12:51 pm
OK, OK, so you obviously know what you're talking about. My sceptical retort to your initial post was designed to either expose you as either a fraud, or an idiot. Or, to goad you to fight your corner (which you have done) and prove that you are the real deal. I have not heard of you, or your production company, which seemed odd as most British porno people either know each other, or know of each other. But you 'talk the talk' (Avid, Sony DSR, SMTP) and now you've given us more background it seems like you 'walk the walk.'
I most certainly don't think 'Ben Dover' is King. The brand name and marketing is good - but with all due respect to Lindsey, whom I know is capable of much better stuff - I think the content is appalling shite. Though it must be said he has sold quite a lot of it. And that's the problem in the UK. Now any nobhead with a crap camera from 'Dixons' can be a 'Ben Dover' (hence the housewives and cucumbers which you alluded to) there's less incentive to make quality movies.
Anyhow, good luck with the movies and when I'm passing 'Le Chambre' I may call in and say hello.
Officer Dibble ? Keeping the peace on his patch.
I most certainly don't think 'Ben Dover' is King. The brand name and marketing is good - but with all due respect to Lindsey, whom I know is capable of much better stuff - I think the content is appalling shite. Though it must be said he has sold quite a lot of it. And that's the problem in the UK. Now any nobhead with a crap camera from 'Dixons' can be a 'Ben Dover' (hence the housewives and cucumbers which you alluded to) there's less incentive to make quality movies.
Anyhow, good luck with the movies and when I'm passing 'Le Chambre' I may call in and say hello.
Officer Dibble ? Keeping the peace on his patch.