Page 4 of 4

Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:40 pm
by middle_aged_dutchman
I don't know much about about tennis, but I do know something about chess.
The Dutch grandmaster Jan Hein Donner, Dutch chess champion for many years, once argued women are unable to play chess. A feminist went berserk: "The next thing he will tell us is that negroes are unable to play chess." Donner replied: "This lady has not quite understood my article. Negroes are perfectly able to play chess, but negresses aren't."
Donner died in 1988, the year Judit Polg?r, the first female chess player who preferred to play against men instead of women, started her career. Judit is now the number thirteen chess player in the world (two years ago she was in the Top Ten). I have heard that many promising junior chess players are girls nowadays. None of them feels the need to confine herself to playing against women.
Would a female tennis player be able to defeat a man? Perhaps she should just give it a try. Then we shall know for sure if "any male club pro would beat any woman player". There is a precedent, by the way. In 1973, the female tennis player Billy Jean King defeated Bobby Riggs, who had boasted he could beat any woman player.
Personally, I was on King's side. Not because of my middle-class background, not because of my left leanings (if I still have any; I had them 15 years ago, but since then the left-wing parties in the Netherlands said and did too many things that I heartily disagreed with) and not because I am particularly fond of feminists. I just love to see a big-mouthed braggart bite the dust. Perhaps it's the Dutch national character.

M_A_D: proud to be middle-class!

Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:59 pm
by Peter
middle_aged_dutchman wrote:

In 1973, the female tennis player Billy
> Jean King defeated Bobby Riggs, who had boasted he could beat
> any woman player.

Yes, 29 yr old current pro King beat 55 yr old retired pro Riggs in a match where she had the advantage of playing singles rules whilst he played doubles rules. hardly a scientific test.

BTW, the top 10 women earned 4% more at last years Wimbledon than the top 10 men.

Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:18 am
by Boo2
Peter wrote:

> Yes, 29 yr old current pro King beat 55 yr old retired pro
> Riggs in a match where she had the advantage of playing singles
> rules whilst he played doubles rules. hardly a scientific test.

Urban legend !teacher!

?In recent years a persistent urban legend has arisen, particularly on the Internet, that the rules were modified for the match so that Riggs had only one serve for King's two, and that King was allowed to hit into the doubles court area. This is false; the match was played under the normal rules of tennis.?

> ?Battle of the Sexes?


Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:04 am
by mart
Where did you crib that from Dibble?
I was referring to the term "political correctness" coined in the US by the right wing and used to attack what they saw as a growing menace froim liberals who believed in basic human rights like equality.

Mart

Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:54 am
by Officer Dibble
?I was referring to the term "political correctness"

Ah! There you go again, mart. You were NOT referring to "the term? political correctness; you were specifically referring to ?the concept?. Hence my reply. If I could just take you back a couple of posts to your original intervention, you said this ?





Officer Dibble




Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:00 am
by Deano!
Ahhhhh...Anna. Still my favourite. Worth every cent.

Re: Wimbledon prize money 'equality'

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:12 pm
by crofter
What they don't know is that the "Strict Dress Code" they have to comply with to get their equal price money has drastically altered:



Anyone for doubles??