Page 4 of 5

Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:27 pm
by Ned
Depends where they are and how big they are. And what they are.

An ex had a sun on her shoulder, which was really sexy. A friend has a big tribal jobby on her shoulder that I don't like much. It's too big, although the design is cool.

The one I hate is the tattoo on the small of the back. The type that's visible above the waistband of jeans. I hate tattoos there.

Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:55 pm
by fudgeflaps
I have 'MYSTIFY' tattooed on my bell end.

When I get erect, and the bulb expands, it reads, 'MY STIFY'.


Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:48 pm
by Trumpton
warren zevon rip wrote:

> Surely this suggsts you have "deep rooted personal problems" if
> you associate all tattooed people with hooliganism or with
> having psychological problems.

1), I don't and 2), I didn't

>Poor wee Victoria Brown and Isabel Ice! Maybe we should ban them from the forum - the hooligans! The psychos!

As I understand it Victoria Brown has one of the best personalities in the porn industry. I've never called for anyone to be banned from this, or indeed, any forum!
>
> Each to their own. If you don't fancy tattoed girls don't buy porn with them in

When possible I do just that!

Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:33 pm
by Trumpton
warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> Surely this suggsts you have "deep rooted personal problems" if
> you associate all tattooed people with hooliganism or with
> having psychological problems.

Where is your evidence to back up this obviously incorrect statement?

Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:04 pm
by tommy dickfingers
their just a bit pointless to me, and doesn't make anyone look any better.

Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:15 pm
by one eyed jack
I vote yes. Though there are some bad taste tats that leave a lot to be desired. Then again, some tats are sexy too. All depends on your taste


Re: Girls with tattoos... yes or no?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:04 pm
by fudgeflaps
People are unique as they are naturally. A tattoo removes your individuality, as other people may have said tattoo (other people may have the same clothes, but this situation is both changeable and reversible); the only way to ensure a UNIQUE tattoo is to personalise and copyright it.

I went with a girl once, who had this above near her nether-parts: '001- licence to thrill'. I cringed, she seemed classier than that. Tacky tawdry shite, and her trying to be 'smart' and 'unique'. At least I can laugh at how sad it is! !wink!

A tattoo is an identifying feature- it REMOVES your individuality, it doesn't 'enhance' or 'promote' your uniqueness, as the philistines may think.

I used to work in a specialised field. What is the first set of questions the cops ask a victim?

Any identifying features? Hair, piercings......... TATTOOS??

Your genetic code makes you unique. Not a fucking grafted needle-based doodley-scrawl.

I am against the principle of tattooing, not people who have tattoos.

Wake up.