egafd.com

Like a speeding driver never killed anyone.

What is it with you law and order types that you pick and choose which offences are serious and which are nannying or money-raising schemes? Drink-drivers kill people; speeding drivers kill people. The most casual search of newspaper reports will tell you that----but then you're not interested in facts, are you?

Yes, indeed, poo is very important to this debate.

Do we NEED officers armed with ordure? Should it be dog-turds or human?
And if the former, should it be the moist brown stuff or the ctumbly white
variety? And if the latter, given the apparent scarcity of it shouldn't the
Govt. adopt a comprehensive dog-diet advice programme [with perhaps
a couple of new Quangos] to prvent stockpiling and a run on the pound?

Nah......the difference is in the intent, however the results are usually the same.

Speeders/drink drivers think that because they never go out intending to kill, that they're ok morally (it cannot be ignorance because the facts are now widely known). They're just looking for excuses for their actions.

You haven't seen it [and that'll end some rather ugly rumours....], so there.

We try.
And it's TCP at the mo....

And it's all the fault of those pesky speed cameras, or they'd get away with it.