Page 4 of 6
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:24 pm
by jj
...so a 'phat beeyatch' is one who engages in meaningless
conversation?
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:25 pm
by max_tranmere
If done face to face or on the phone, yes, but if typed on one of those sites, no, just like I explained above.
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:26 pm
by jj
But he'd have to still ask her to have a shag.
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:26 pm
by jj
Words, surely !!
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:27 pm
by jj
If the wish were father to the thought...........
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:28 pm
by jj
Another fan : -))))))
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:35 pm
by jj
one eyed jack wrote:
> The good thing about those social networking sites is that you
> cant catch swine flu or HIV or nasty stds.
....yes, but if we stop interacting with each other face-to-face
aren't we losing something vital? Isn't it a symptom of our
increasingly 'gated-community' society?
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:36 pm
by jj
By about 1%.
Pointlessness is good- in moderation !
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:39 pm
by max_tranmere
jj, it is a porn forum because people join it for that reason. Once they've joined it they then may consider posting on the O/T forum, but the key reason for joining was the porn element.
Re: Is Facebook largely pointless?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:50 pm
by jj
Splitting hairs, and poor logic.