egafd.com

So did you take up my wager?

I'm willing.

Every time you point to that post you actually show everyone that I didn't call you a cunt. That's why you didn't take up my wager.....you're not even confident enough of your own judgement.

I wouldn't have expected you to keep your side of the bargain anyway so chill. I was just testing you and you failed. !happy!

Of course, the question you linked to, typed by me, just implies that you're a nasty cunt, or, even, shows that I just assume that you are.

Now we've got that cleared up lets return to your denial of saying anything nasty. You avoided answering my question about the statements: "Camilla Parker Bowles has broken her leg!!.Pity it wasn't her fucking neck." Again, how is that not nasty?

Secondly you purport that 'all ginger girls smell' and that since it is just your opinion it's not nasty to say so. You could be right but I'm not so unfair as to ask you to prove it because I know it's almost unprovable. Since I'm a reasonable guy I just challenged you to make a thread about the ginger porn stars on the database, calling them all stinky/smelly due to their hair colour, so we could find out what others think about your 'opinions'. Your silence implies you've declined yet another challenge.

You seemed so self aware when you admitted your alias of 'porn historian' was a little laughable around these parts. And yet - and yet you seem so myopic when it came to Somalia, and even more self-deluding when it comes to your attitude in this and the Patsy Palmer thread.

I think you need more self-reflection, or introspection, PH. Being a bit of a supposed 'do-gooder' I want to help. I've gone to the trouble of finding a local Buddhist Temple that do courses and I think it might just be the ticket.

It's in Eskdalemuir and the website is . Let me know what you think.

And please....no thanks or anything. It's my pleasure.

Question marks matter.

Porn Historian is wonderful. An opinion of you, which someone, not necessarily all of us, might have.

Is Porn Historian wonderful? A question. However, it does not state a view. It suggests you may be wonderful, but also that you may not be.

Cheers
D

Sam you called him "a nasty cunt" so to me that still means you called him a cunt.
Please explain the difference.

You need to go to spec-savers. As the 'black and white' states:

"You joined back up just to remind us all you're a nasty cunt?"

It's a question based on the premise you're a 'nasty cunt'. You can only take from that question the assumption that:

a) I think you're a nasty cunt.

b) I'm implying you're a nasty cunt.

c) I both think you are, and imply that you're a nasty cunt.

You said I called you a cunt, when, as you can see (in black and white no less!) that I didn't.

Now, you could argue, with more justification, that implying you're a nasty cunt, by asking you a question based on the premise that you are, is nasty in it's own way - but you didn't.

It comes to something when I have to think up the best counter arguments to my own arguments. Pull yer finger out, PH!!! !laugh!

All was explained in my last few posts to porn historian.