UK Pornochicks - Your Views

[P R Mann]

Yes, although the front page and previews are a refreshing change from the pathetic non-design of most UK sites the whole thing screams out corporate American porn and bought in content. The look of the site is clean, but bland, it has no soul, it looks exactly like 50,000 other American porno sites, it looks as though it was stamped out of a website cyber-template. I don't quite understand where you?re going with it Bob but if it is a site specialising in British girls why not have a British vibe to it? (And I don't mean some monstrosity knocked up by 'Dave' the divi electrician on Microsoft Front page. Wouldn't the Americans appreciate a well-designed Brit site too? Do they really need more of what they already have?

I haven?t been in the site so I can't comment further. However, I would be very cautions of all those gushing compliments further up the thread - Talk is cheap, people who want to be your pal tell you what you want to hear - it doesn?t cost anything and it keeps things sweet, it's the easy way ahead. So why not go back to those who had the most fulsome prise and ask them "Hey, glad you like it dude. So, how long would you like to sign up for then?" My experience in the Uni Of Life tells me that they will glance at their watches as the suddenly remember they have a rather pressing engagement elsewhere.

Don't mean the rain on your parade Bob (well, maybe just a little drizzle) but one has to be realistic. Apart from the negative points that I've highlighted I get the impression that the project in general is well organised and is a serious attempt to build a world-class adult entertainment site. I also admire your balls - making a serious investment in the adult market at a time when it appears to be contracting.


P R Mann - Professionally speaking.

[Bob Spunkhouse]

The navigation bar on the bottom right hand corner should start working any second now...this will give you access to loads more!!

[Lizard]

I,ll echo that Bob, the splash page is great!look at some of the
boring "front page" stlye site around, they look dated with the usual girl dressed in a union jack dress or underwear etc, and fonts by "lego".The site will,as someone said, stand or fall on content, frequency of updates etc.

[pablo66]

Bob

The site looks good and navigation is easy, but my only gripe if I had just joined the site on the strength of your first flash page, is that you don't have what you say you have for each girl actually on the site, not unlike a lot of other sites out there granted.

email me of list and I'll give you examples

pablo

[buttsie]

One site that has what it says and is the benchmark as far as I the punter am concerned is
in my view one of the best designed sites for ease of navigation

I'm still perplexed why they offer a 5 day tour when you can see
all the sets of pics they offer before joining

cheers
B...OZ

[Bob Spunkhouse]

I know that Charmaine Sinclaire, Jo Guest, Adele Stephens (apart from a video) Michelle Thorne content is not up yet... actually Adele and Michelle are login into



The content is there just not laid out properly...it will be finished in a few hours..

[Bob Spunkhouse]

"I'm still perplexed why they offer a 5 day tour when you can see
all the sets of pics they offer before joining" - you cant see
99% of our stuff before joining...all the people with the free passes will verify that the site was updated today with videos plus galleries...plus the "extra bits" have started to be added..

[buttsie]

I was referring to the site when saying I was perplexed.....not yours Bob Spunkhouse.

My point was that you can see what you are getting for your money upfront.Being able to view all the girls,all of their sets,recent updates before you even join is a great way to go.


cheers
B..OZ

[Yosser]

I ain't looking until the payment is made on a secure server.

[Bob Spunkhouse]

is a secure server so is and we give you the option of all of them...and pay via or