Although she did that set for ?Silwa, it's slightly odd that [AFAIK] she never did
a movie for them [i.e. V'rama] or DBM.
If she had done, it would have involved her wearing cornflower-blue or ultramarine
lingerie. Pale blue, at outsider odds.
Her penchant for blue undies is now an Official Interweb Factoid, and therefore
utterly true.
Nationality?
Re: more from same Hard BG set
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Deuce Bigolo
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re:
Thanks for the blue reminder...need to replace the toilet fresheners
which leads nicely into why she most likely did very little ie dislike of anal
3/4 films and and a handful of pic sets all in the same year says she wasnt exactly a porn career girl
I always got the impression she wasnt exactly into anal with some of her expressions looking painful.
The Euros might do it all when asked but i think some anecdotal postings over the year say they dont particularly enjoy certain acts and thats led to a lot of very short porn stints.
which leads nicely into why she most likely did very little ie dislike of anal
3/4 films and and a handful of pic sets all in the same year says she wasnt exactly a porn career girl
I always got the impression she wasnt exactly into anal with some of her expressions looking painful.
The Euros might do it all when asked but i think some anecdotal postings over the year say they dont particularly enjoy certain acts and thats led to a lot of very short porn stints.
Re:
Takes all sorts. She seemed happier doing the French stuff- inasmuch you can
ever tell real feelings from such flicks.
She had thick ankles, too......
ever tell real feelings from such flicks.
She had thick ankles, too......
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Deuce Bigolo
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re:
Without a doubt
Doing Solo your in control
Being monstered while doing a DP your counting the money
Count on it
I can think of only a handful of performers that actually seem to enjoy DPs
ie Krystal de boor
The giveaway that they dont is their careers are brief after they've done them
karina from woodman castings 2/triple x 27 did 1 and was gone like a flash
in the same way as Alexandra/Sandra.
Makes me wonder if they were paid more to do them so they'd make what ever money they were after quicker as opposed to having to do more lesser level bg scenes...
Working to anal seems to be standard for Euros but DP not so much
The barely legal outfit used to pay 50% loading if they did anal.
Doing Solo your in control
Being monstered while doing a DP your counting the money
Count on it
I can think of only a handful of performers that actually seem to enjoy DPs
ie Krystal de boor
The giveaway that they dont is their careers are brief after they've done them
karina from woodman castings 2/triple x 27 did 1 and was gone like a flash
in the same way as Alexandra/Sandra.
Makes me wonder if they were paid more to do them so they'd make what ever money they were after quicker as opposed to having to do more lesser level bg scenes...
Working to anal seems to be standard for Euros but DP not so much
The barely legal outfit used to pay 50% loading if they did anal.
Re:
I know little about the economics but would have assumed that the 'harder' the
work [in any sense you choose], the higher the rate.
A recent US trend that I've mentioned before seems to be that many girls now
[more or less] happily do anal- often with multiple partners in the one scene- but
have few or no DPs on their C.V. This seems to me quite literally perverse. If the
anal is the 'hard' part, and you're already doing that, why not [assuming a higher
pay-scale, and no significant added health-risk*] cram another up the main pipe
and pocket the extra wonga?
*It's possible the general morass of health-misinformation in the US industry
has given these girls the idea that avoidance of most contact between orifices is
a safeguard. It isn't. For this to be true one would have to eschew any vaginal
contact whatever, and between ALL orifices, in the chaotic hothouse atmosphere
of a shoot- impossible.
And anyway, in terms of overall risk modern shoots are probably a good deal
safer than, say, the kitchens of most restaurants and the lavatories of many
factories.
work [in any sense you choose], the higher the rate.
A recent US trend that I've mentioned before seems to be that many girls now
[more or less] happily do anal- often with multiple partners in the one scene- but
have few or no DPs on their C.V. This seems to me quite literally perverse. If the
anal is the 'hard' part, and you're already doing that, why not [assuming a higher
pay-scale, and no significant added health-risk*] cram another up the main pipe
and pocket the extra wonga?
*It's possible the general morass of health-misinformation in the US industry
has given these girls the idea that avoidance of most contact between orifices is
a safeguard. It isn't. For this to be true one would have to eschew any vaginal
contact whatever, and between ALL orifices, in the chaotic hothouse atmosphere
of a shoot- impossible.
And anyway, in terms of overall risk modern shoots are probably a good deal
safer than, say, the kitchens of most restaurants and the lavatories of many
factories.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Deuce Bigolo
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
o/t Re:
After reading this its safe to say many others would avoid it for similar reasons
I'd be interested to know if all the cases of collapsed anus were from repeated DPs,anal or both.
"The chief risk of DP is transmission of a sexually-related infection or disease. Safe lovers use condoms for both front and rear penetration.
Since the activity puts a lot of stress on delicate tissues, the risk of tearing is greater than with single penetration.
This makes use of a non-permeable condom essential as any tear or abrasion is susceptible to disease.
Women may stain, get sore, or have unexpected discharge after DP. These are all normal reactions to intense penetrations"
I'd be interested to know if all the cases of collapsed anus were from repeated DPs,anal or both.
"The chief risk of DP is transmission of a sexually-related infection or disease. Safe lovers use condoms for both front and rear penetration.
Since the activity puts a lot of stress on delicate tissues, the risk of tearing is greater than with single penetration.
This makes use of a non-permeable condom essential as any tear or abrasion is susceptible to disease.
Women may stain, get sore, or have unexpected discharge after DP. These are all normal reactions to intense penetrations"
Re: o/t Re:
Deuce Bigolo wrote:
> I'd be interested to know if all the cases of collapsed anus
> were from repeated DPs,anal or both.
As would I- but hard stats are rare; pundits prefer to generate heat rather
than light.
> "The chief risk of DP is transmission of a sexually-related infection or disease.
This is meaningless without quantiication and cross-comparison of the risk. There
is a risk that I may spontaneously combust- but it's a pretty small one.
> Safe lovers use condoms for both front and rear penetration.
This is a non-sequitur, aside from being arrant nonsense.
Make sure, BTW, that you wash your hands, too, before putting them in your
mouth. That's EVERY time; every one of the hundreds of times a day you
[often unconsciously] do this. You forgot? You haven't got the time or the
wherewithal? Congratulations- you just made a sensible risk-assessment,
and behaved accordingly. This last para. is no more patronizing and insulting
in its way than the quoted sentence.
My point is this: NO occupation is risk-free, but our risk-averse society largely
refuses to acknowledge this, in the misguided belief that it can be completely
eliminated. It can't. What is needed is a sensible approach to the management of
risk, without other agendas creeping in.
IMO the risk of tearing is greater in anal than DP, largely for the reason that
it's hard to get a vigorous rhythm going in the latter. Any open lesion is of
course susceptible to infection but I would assume that anyone not completely
brain-dead would douche immediately post-coitus with a mild antiseptic solution
[for 'cosmetic' motives if for no other], taking care of all but the most persistent
of microbial nasties; I also assume that performers practise basic hygiene before
the event, and have with them the relevant and current [less than 1 month old] certs.
And to, um, stretch the point: why aren't all kitchens and lavatories, with their
far greater potential [by several orders of magnitude] for disease-transmission,
treated as aseptic areas? Answer: cost/benefit ratio and practicality- IOW. sensible
risk-assessment. Why these nongs choose to target this industry in particular is
the more interesting question. I don't see them getting all het up about the
statistically-verified huge number of people permanently crippled every year by
RSI or poor lifting-technique or slack road-sense.... instead they choose to moan
about the small number [how small? We don't know- where are the numbers?]
similarly at risk in this biz. How do I know it's small? How many more typists are
there than performers? Do the arithmetic.
> I'd be interested to know if all the cases of collapsed anus
> were from repeated DPs,anal or both.
As would I- but hard stats are rare; pundits prefer to generate heat rather
than light.
> "The chief risk of DP is transmission of a sexually-related infection or disease.
This is meaningless without quantiication and cross-comparison of the risk. There
is a risk that I may spontaneously combust- but it's a pretty small one.
> Safe lovers use condoms for both front and rear penetration.
This is a non-sequitur, aside from being arrant nonsense.
Make sure, BTW, that you wash your hands, too, before putting them in your
mouth. That's EVERY time; every one of the hundreds of times a day you
[often unconsciously] do this. You forgot? You haven't got the time or the
wherewithal? Congratulations- you just made a sensible risk-assessment,
and behaved accordingly. This last para. is no more patronizing and insulting
in its way than the quoted sentence.
My point is this: NO occupation is risk-free, but our risk-averse society largely
refuses to acknowledge this, in the misguided belief that it can be completely
eliminated. It can't. What is needed is a sensible approach to the management of
risk, without other agendas creeping in.
IMO the risk of tearing is greater in anal than DP, largely for the reason that
it's hard to get a vigorous rhythm going in the latter. Any open lesion is of
course susceptible to infection but I would assume that anyone not completely
brain-dead would douche immediately post-coitus with a mild antiseptic solution
[for 'cosmetic' motives if for no other], taking care of all but the most persistent
of microbial nasties; I also assume that performers practise basic hygiene before
the event, and have with them the relevant and current [less than 1 month old] certs.
And to, um, stretch the point: why aren't all kitchens and lavatories, with their
far greater potential [by several orders of magnitude] for disease-transmission,
treated as aseptic areas? Answer: cost/benefit ratio and practicality- IOW. sensible
risk-assessment. Why these nongs choose to target this industry in particular is
the more interesting question. I don't see them getting all het up about the
statistically-verified huge number of people permanently crippled every year by
RSI or poor lifting-technique or slack road-sense.... instead they choose to moan
about the small number [how small? We don't know- where are the numbers?]
similarly at risk in this biz. How do I know it's small? How many more typists are
there than performers? Do the arithmetic.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Deuce Bigolo
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Cum Covered 2 DP Zane
Amateurishly shot scenes - the bane of my eyes
Should be titled Biology 101 - bad angles & lighting
I swear they were using a torch for the lighting
At VOD site ...10 minutes free look if you can be bothered to up your email addy which they dont spam touch wood
[IMG]http://thumbnails57.imagebam.com/15502/a9b651155014446.jpg[/IMG]
Scene 1. Alexandra Yull, Max Cortes, Philippe Dean
Brunette & 2 Euro guys. BJ/handjob. No hands BJ for each. On bed. BJs
for both. Fingers her. Screwing doggy position & BJ. Thumbs her ass.
Anal reverse cowgirl. DP reverse cowgirl, doggy. Anal & no hands BJ.
The first girl is a very sexy brunette who comes out onto her terrace topless and starts beckoning guys from the street to come and join her. A couple of guys race up to help this poor women get her fill of cock. Without a word, she gets on her knees and starts sucking both cocks. This kind of girl can brighten up any porn flick. They move into the bedroom and she manages to take both cocks in her mouth at once for a short time. Mostly she sucks one while the other one beats against her face. One guy moves around behind for some standing doggy. While he fucks her, he�s slapping her ass and playing with her asshole, probing it for later use. No problem here as both guys hammer away on her holes. Dont you just love women who will take strangers off the street for some DP fun? There are some lighting issues with this scene, but the action is hard, fast and this chick looks so fucking good, it really doesnt matter. (That much.) The guys leave two loads of cum onto her face. She gets dressed and walks through the lobby of the hotel with something dripping from her face. (Probably cum mixed with something to make it more visible.) Though she only passes one guy, the look on his face is priceless.
Screwing & BJ. 2 facials. Lots of cum. Walks in lobby.
Should be titled Biology 101 - bad angles & lighting
I swear they were using a torch for the lighting
At VOD site ...10 minutes free look if you can be bothered to up your email addy which they dont spam touch wood
[IMG]http://thumbnails57.imagebam.com/15502/a9b651155014446.jpg[/IMG]
Scene 1. Alexandra Yull, Max Cortes, Philippe Dean
Brunette & 2 Euro guys. BJ/handjob. No hands BJ for each. On bed. BJs
for both. Fingers her. Screwing doggy position & BJ. Thumbs her ass.
Anal reverse cowgirl. DP reverse cowgirl, doggy. Anal & no hands BJ.
The first girl is a very sexy brunette who comes out onto her terrace topless and starts beckoning guys from the street to come and join her. A couple of guys race up to help this poor women get her fill of cock. Without a word, she gets on her knees and starts sucking both cocks. This kind of girl can brighten up any porn flick. They move into the bedroom and she manages to take both cocks in her mouth at once for a short time. Mostly she sucks one while the other one beats against her face. One guy moves around behind for some standing doggy. While he fucks her, he�s slapping her ass and playing with her asshole, probing it for later use. No problem here as both guys hammer away on her holes. Dont you just love women who will take strangers off the street for some DP fun? There are some lighting issues with this scene, but the action is hard, fast and this chick looks so fucking good, it really doesnt matter. (That much.) The guys leave two loads of cum onto her face. She gets dressed and walks through the lobby of the hotel with something dripping from her face. (Probably cum mixed with something to make it more visible.) Though she only passes one guy, the look on his face is priceless.
Screwing & BJ. 2 facials. Lots of cum. Walks in lobby.
Re: Cum Covered 2 DP Zane
I picked up the DVD years ago, for a song.
I agree, the shooting/lighting of her scene is appalling; Sandra's one is a little
bit better.
I agree, the shooting/lighting of her scene is appalling; Sandra's one is a little
bit better.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
Deuce Bigolo
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Cum Covered 2 DP Zane
If you went by the caps on the lead in page you'd think it was Ok
How wrong you would be....Not an isolated case sadly
Makes me wonder if this is worth searching out?
Though reading the review the bane of the bj the guy having to jerk himself off seems to be in play
[IMG]http://img152.imagevenue.com/loc876/th_88117_californian_cocksuckers_123_876lo.jpg[/IMG]
Review of her scene in Californian Cocksuckers 11
Scene Eight: Sandra.
Filmed indoors. Sandra is an attractive brunette (her face sort of resembles Neve Campbell's). She strokes a cock in her mouth. Sandra eyes the camera. The guy jerks off as he cums on her face and tongue. She gives some small sucks on the head of his cock as she eyes the camera.
How wrong you would be....Not an isolated case sadly
Makes me wonder if this is worth searching out?
Though reading the review the bane of the bj the guy having to jerk himself off seems to be in play
[IMG]http://img152.imagevenue.com/loc876/th_88117_californian_cocksuckers_123_876lo.jpg[/IMG]
![[IMG]http://img152.imagevenue.com/loc876/th_88117_californian_cocksuckers_123_876lo.jpg[/IMG]](http://img152.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=88117_californian_cocksuckers_123_876lo.jpg){kind=link}
Review of her scene in Californian Cocksuckers 11
Scene Eight: Sandra.
Filmed indoors. Sandra is an attractive brunette (her face sort of resembles Neve Campbell's). She strokes a cock in her mouth. Sandra eyes the camera. The guy jerks off as he cums on her face and tongue. She gives some small sucks on the head of his cock as she eyes the camera.