Page 5 of 9

Re: bluebird ?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:14 pm
by Cenobitez
I disagree 100% with exclusive deals from a friend of talents point of view, because, what is left for the talent to do after 3, 6, 9, 12 months with 1 company shooting 1-2 weekly ?

Lets say Digi PG hires Alice on a 6 month contract, they shoot 2 scenes complete with stills, and 2 photo only sets upto solo hard each week.

Alice does Anal, Toys, WS, 2, 3, 4 people, interacial, over 26 weeks, theres 50+ scenes with stills and 80+ photosets, now lets say Alice leaves, looking for work.

Randy has a website, but only wants to book Alice for 2 scenes with stills, but Randy asks himself how many poeple would sign up to the site with 140 photo sets (inc stills) and 50+ videos of Alice compared with Randy who booked her after the 6 months and has 2 scenes with stills, and 3 solo sets on his site ?

Where does it leave the girl ?

However as a business, Exclusive contracts a MASSIVE pull, if the girl is new, theres nothing else, and no where else with the goods, so you have no choice but to go to the source.


Re: bluebird ?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:22 pm
by Cenobitez
OK Randy, I'll give you Relish, as I don't know 100%, I assumed that multiple consecutive appearances in films, would have been a multi-film deal.

However, Im 98% sure, Harmony either DO or are about to start to, doing contract girls.

Lana Cox is all over this forum at the moment, and Faye is one of the best known UK girls .

I agree 100% that ALL companies drop contract girls when the pull stops, not just DPG and Vivid.

Anyway, we have differing views, simple as that :)


Re: bluebird ?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:55 pm
by Sam Slater
That's wierd because Michelle B's website has also been taken down and points to Doll Theatre.

I know Michelle B was having problems with her website, and the people who ran it, so it seems things aren't quite right.

I also heard along the grapevine that Michelle B turned down a contract from Bluebird because of the things Paul was asking her to do *cough* *cough*...and now Doll Theatre are joining foces with Bluebird you say?

Interesting....


Re: bluebird ?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:43 pm
by MegaTon
What the hSam Slater wrote:

> That's wierd because Michelle B's website has also been taken
> down and points to Doll Theatre.
>
> I know Michelle B was having problems with her website, and the
> people who ran it, so it seems things aren't quite right.
>
> I also heard along the grapevine that Michelle B turned down a
> contract from Bluebird because of the things Paul was asking
> her to do *cough* *cough*...and now Doll Theatre are joining
> foces with Bluebird you say?
>
> Interesting....
>
>

What the hells going on here? Its like the MI

Take overs and girls been poached ( so it looks like ) from other people.
No one really saying anything.

Here's a few other names i heard as well, the ones that are well- known here!

Elle Brook
Karen Wood
Antonia Stokes
Roxanna
Lolly Badcock
Susie Best
& and Abi Toyne surprising?

Just wish someone would makean announcement pretty soon. So we know what's going on here!

Re: bluebird ?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:19 pm
by Sam Slater
Lets just say there are girls that will, and girls that won't.

The girls that will, will be signed to BB, and the girls that won't, will be free.

The following is my theory and just a theory, which may not become truth (I wouldn't want to be threatened with legal action): BB will try to sign up every director out there, and tell them not to book any girl that won't, leaving those girls with no work unless they become girls that will. It's already started, allegedly.

I hope this makes sense...


Re: bluebird ?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:50 pm
by Sam Slater
Depends..... In the short term, maybe.

Maybe this site will be run by Bluebird within 12 months?