egafd.com

probably because the victims can't just move on! People back then knew it was wrong - OBVIOUSLY as they didn't do it in public or talk about it down the pub with there mates?

Comments like your's make me feel sick - would you feel the same if it was you who was raped? or your children? (but with your comments don't suppose you have any)

As for paedophiles - they should be killed or at least have there bits chopped off (without pain relief - hahaha).

As for religion - I always think that we would all be better off if it was banned - BAN all religion alover the world - knock down every church etc. and burn every bible etc. and the world would be sooooo much better.

Louise
(non believer)

Louise,
Right on baby! Certify all priests as insane and lock them up.
Mike.

I'll bet more people got cramp from reading the Kama Sutra.

I mention Marilyn because although she was seen as a bimbo she was an intelligent woman?

Yes, that?s right. Marilyn was fascinated by, and attracted to, intellectuals and men of substance - like Arthur Miller and JFK. She herself was a complicated woman and certainly not just the dumb blonde that she subsequently came to epitomize.


?who used her sexual attraction to get the guy that she wanted and this is an example of feminine intelligence.?

I get your general drift, Mike, but the way you worded that seems a little odd. What you mean is that she used her ?womanly wiles?, her rampant femininity and sexuality, to get her man. Nothing wrong with that ? indeed there?s nothing quite as beguiling or irresistible as a beautiful woman who understands her own sexuality and instinctively knows how to use it. Sadly, as today?s young chav birds become evermore androgynous, asexual, and male-like, these feminine virtues (or delights) are rapidly evaporating. But even in Marylyn?s day it was not every woman that was blessed with this particular brand of ?feminine intelligence?. Some had it, some didn?t. Some had just a bit. But back then society was organized in such a way that those women who had even the slightest inkling about the power of their sexuality could hone their skills by observing the women who were at the top of their game ? the Taylors, Monroes and Lorens, etc, as well as the sexually attractive women in their own office ? the women who always seemed to have dishy guys with big wads and sports cars buzzing round them. Back then it was a man?s world and if a woman was to get ahead it meant having to deploy the weapons that nature had imbued her with (her sexuality) against which no man (with red blood in his veins) was immune ? an awed photographer, who worked with Monroe, once told how he regularly saw the most sober-suited studio executives lose their minds in her presence.

Sadly, nowadays everything (and more) is handed to women on a plate by poncy middleclass PC sorts. Consequently, they don?t have to bother looking attractive for men anymore. They needn't bother about their hair or make-up, and why waste time learning and practicing all those womanly wiles? ? after all, that kind of stuff is for girls, right? You know, when we hear the frequent laments that today?s? birds somehow just don?t hit the spot, don?t seem as notable or appealing as the dolly birds we lusted after in days of yor, this is the ultimate reason. Girls don?t seem as appealing nowadays simply because they aren?t, they don?t need to be.


?Fourteen year olds maybe legally children but they are not and can be sexually mature.?

Yes, we know this. But that still doesn?t mean it?s OK for an old boy like you to shag them, Mike ? for all the reasons I, and others, have already laid out.


?It is because of your attitude that we have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe. The Dutch have the lowest?

It?s nothing to do with my attitude, Mike. It?s to do with the attitude of society in general. In many European states, and the southern Catholic states in particular, teenage motherhood is seriously frowned on. It is a social no-no ? much like it used to be here. But ever since the 60?s poncy middleclass PC sorts have made teenage motherhood ever more financially viable and socially acceptable. Now, any stupid young chav bird who may not be up to the task of handling a till in Tesco can get free money and even a house ? no qualifications required - all they have to do is produce the next generation of chavs, social problems, and welfare dependents. Any chav bird would be totally, well, stupid not to sign up for such a deal. And what does everyone else do ? nothing! Apathy and complacency are now rampant. The government and public sector are shafting the British people (tax payers) over, and yet no one seems to care ? or know what day it is, for that matter. The UK?s teenage pregnancy problem would be so easy to solve ? blitz them with contraception, wean them off financial benefits and make it socially unacceptable to be a feckless, deadbeat, teenage mother ? which would of course require a modicum of contempt and finger pointing, not to mention a little less public apathy.


?You seem to be on your high moral horse and have certain ideas about what is acceptable?

Quite right, Mike. I have quite clear ideas about almost everything. You know, it?s jolly good fun to be able to puff yourself up and have a right good chortle while others squirm. A wizard wheeze, in fact.


?As far as I am concerned you are just a hypocritical,mysogynistic patriarch and a control freak.?

Mike, I really must protest. This is totally unfair ? in fact I?d go as far as to declare it a travesty. Yes, a travesty. Is this the thanks I get for merely doing my civic duty ? a tirade of abuse and heinous accusations, when all I was seeking to do was to alert the good folks of the bgafd community to the threat of pervy old geezers eyeing up their daughters? Is this all the thanks I get for being an exemplary citizen - for being a righteous, upstanding, pillar of the community? Shame on you, Mike. This day will go down in infamy! Yes, I say! INFAMY! - As the day when Officer Dibble, a man of honor, a man of dignity and principle, was so heinously wronged. If there is a God in heaven surely he is looking down upon us with uncommon anguish and the most grievous wrath!


?I would like to wire you up to a plesymograph and get a nubile teen to strip in front of you.?

Anyhow, Mike. Apart from all that, what?s this ?plesymograph? palaver? I must confess, I?ve never come across one of those before. But from the context of your statement I would surmise that it is an instrument for measuring sexual arousal in the human male. A device, if I?m not mistaken, much like a ?Stonk-a-rometer? or ?Lob-a-graph? which, with the aid of spectral analysis and complex arithmetic algorithms, seeks to measure the purpleness of a chap?s bellend, and thereby reach a conclusion as to his state of arousal? Well, I can tell you now, Mike, it won?t work on me. I find shapeless, bald-beavered, teenies about as stimulating as a dead Aardvark.



Officer Dibble