Re: SHIT CUNT!
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:26 pm
[quote]The ability to fail pain and to suffer is surely linked to intelligence.[/quote]
Erm.......no! !laugh! Maybe emotional pain and suffering, but not physical! Come on WRZ!
[quote]So morality does change according to the animal killed and the reason killed.[/quote]
I agree, I was just playing devils advocate as people seem to overreact to certain animal cruelty, and dismiss other animal death. As a race we are a selfish lot, and are very good at excusing one crime over another to make things more convenient for ourselves. The morals of killing a swan and a rat are different, but that scummy 'swan-killer's' morals aren't that far away from general societies morals........................really. It comes down to killing at the end of the day, regardless of the victim's species.
[quote]The point of the lower level organism is that are MORE of them - so killing ONE beetle does not affect the food chain as much as killing ONE tiger.[/quote]
Of course, of course......but it's believed that man has killed off more plant, fungal and insect species on the planet that mammalian, reptilian and fish species. It's the base of the food chain that holds that chain together......it's the 'base' after all.
[quote].....spiders don't feel pain, wasps don't feel pain....[/quote]
Does this make it right though? I mean, if I stamped on a lambs head hard enough, I could probably kill it instantaneously, with no pain. Or maybe a young calf is born with a disfigured spine and thus all its limbs are paralysed.......would it be ok to saw it's legs off for fun until it passes out through loss of blood (and dying while unconscious, feeling no pain)?
I know I'm just being difficult here, and I'm also angered by this idiot killing a pregnant swan, but you must admit that more people would be annoyed by me sawing off the legs of a baby -paralysed- calf, than pulling the legs of a daddy-long-legs. Both feel no pain, and both are in no way endangered, so why the difference in opinion?........I'll answer for you, it's because we don't see ourselves in insects. They have no human qualities in any way, so we feel better about ourselves in killing them.
Some people would rejoice hearing Michael Barrymore has been stabbed to death, but feel angry and would go to prison in vengeance of a swan. The guy with the air-rifle is a cunt, but knee-cappings, brain damage and comas in retaliation?
*sigh* Over-reaction springs to mind.
It's quiet funny though.............the reaction that is.
EDIT: Just to show how powerful these feelings are, upon proof reading/skimming my post I realised that a capitalised 'swan' but not 'rat'. Makes you think doesn't it?
Erm.......no! !laugh! Maybe emotional pain and suffering, but not physical! Come on WRZ!
[quote]So morality does change according to the animal killed and the reason killed.[/quote]
I agree, I was just playing devils advocate as people seem to overreact to certain animal cruelty, and dismiss other animal death. As a race we are a selfish lot, and are very good at excusing one crime over another to make things more convenient for ourselves. The morals of killing a swan and a rat are different, but that scummy 'swan-killer's' morals aren't that far away from general societies morals........................really. It comes down to killing at the end of the day, regardless of the victim's species.
[quote]The point of the lower level organism is that are MORE of them - so killing ONE beetle does not affect the food chain as much as killing ONE tiger.[/quote]
Of course, of course......but it's believed that man has killed off more plant, fungal and insect species on the planet that mammalian, reptilian and fish species. It's the base of the food chain that holds that chain together......it's the 'base' after all.
[quote].....spiders don't feel pain, wasps don't feel pain....[/quote]
Does this make it right though? I mean, if I stamped on a lambs head hard enough, I could probably kill it instantaneously, with no pain. Or maybe a young calf is born with a disfigured spine and thus all its limbs are paralysed.......would it be ok to saw it's legs off for fun until it passes out through loss of blood (and dying while unconscious, feeling no pain)?
I know I'm just being difficult here, and I'm also angered by this idiot killing a pregnant swan, but you must admit that more people would be annoyed by me sawing off the legs of a baby -paralysed- calf, than pulling the legs of a daddy-long-legs. Both feel no pain, and both are in no way endangered, so why the difference in opinion?........I'll answer for you, it's because we don't see ourselves in insects. They have no human qualities in any way, so we feel better about ourselves in killing them.
Some people would rejoice hearing Michael Barrymore has been stabbed to death, but feel angry and would go to prison in vengeance of a swan. The guy with the air-rifle is a cunt, but knee-cappings, brain damage and comas in retaliation?
*sigh* Over-reaction springs to mind.
It's quiet funny though.............the reaction that is.
EDIT: Just to show how powerful these feelings are, upon proof reading/skimming my post I realised that a capitalised 'swan' but not 'rat'. Makes you think doesn't it?