I first watched it when it was on TV a few years after it came out, after the initial hype had died down, and before the 'best film ever' quotes.
I thought it was fantastic, and by the time I got to the wedding scene I knew it was something special. A few months later, I saw a copy in HMV for ?4, so I bought it, and watched it again, to see if it was as good as I remember, or if I was a little drunk when I watched it - that why I liked Duece Bigelow!
I watched it again and thought t was OK, but not up to my initial viewing, and it wasn't until the next day, when I watched it with her that I started noticing the little things in it that make it so good. I have watched it every few months since then, and I never get bored of it.
Unfortunately, every other film since has copied something from it, but nothing has matched it for the complete package.
Casino is a forgotten classic as well, but I though Taxi Driver was a pile of shit (although It may be better if I watch it again - I hated The Matrix and Gladiator first time I watched them, but now love them).
Although my favourite is L.A. Confidential - if you've never seen it, you can pick it up for less than a fiver most places - do yourself a favour and watch it at least once.
Goodfellas: a humble post
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Goodfellas: a humble post
Are you actually speaking english, or are you just making up words as you go along? I do that too...
Re: Goodfellas: a humble post
L.A. confidentials brilliant russel crowe is great in that as is all the cast.
-
- Posts: 12413
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Goodfellas: a humble post
Well given that this thread has generated 40 responses tells me something. For better or worse for a 10 year old movie it warrants talking about. I personally think it is one of Scorseses finest moments alongside Raging Bull and Taxi Driver. Casino was just Good Fellas with more money in it. I still loved it nonetheless.
If I remember right reading Premier magazine as I did religiously a lot back then, Scorsese very nearly didnt want to make it for the obvious comparisons to Good Fellas but likened the movie to a modern take on the Western which made it all the more appealing to him.
As for DeNiro playing a jew? Why not? He's an actor and did it very well. as we've come to expect from him. He convinced me he was a jew. Then again Ben Kingsley played Gandhi very well. Need I go on?
What about Americans playing Romans? What about? What about? What about?
Its just a movie
If I remember right reading Premier magazine as I did religiously a lot back then, Scorsese very nearly didnt want to make it for the obvious comparisons to Good Fellas but likened the movie to a modern take on the Western which made it all the more appealing to him.
As for DeNiro playing a jew? Why not? He's an actor and did it very well. as we've come to expect from him. He convinced me he was a jew. Then again Ben Kingsley played Gandhi very well. Need I go on?
What about Americans playing Romans? What about? What about? What about?
Its just a movie
www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
Re: Goodfellas: a humble post
Thought de niro was a jew .No your right he is good hes never been in a bad film 1st one i saw him in was raging bull.
Re: Goodfellas: a humble post
You talking to me?warren zevon rip wrote:
> steve56 wrote:
>
> > Thought de niro was a jew .No your right he is good hes never
> > been in a bad film 1st one i saw him in was raging bull.
>
> Has he not been in in some comedies - I never know whether to
> buy them or not - are they really all that?
>
>
> steve56 wrote:
>
> > Thought de niro was a jew .No your right he is good hes never
> > been in a bad film 1st one i saw him in was raging bull.
>
> Has he not been in in some comedies - I never know whether to
> buy them or not - are they really all that?
>
>