egafd.com

Whoops, forgot my point Bimmercat:

Although of course, it's perfectly OK for the Sapphic sisters to dildo themselves into oblivion whilst you wank like a spider monkey. Just as long as no buff muscle boys decide to plunge into each other, everything is just fine and dandy right?

Bimmey,

Chill out homez......in this beautiful Isle of bad teeth, TB and pit diasters, where we as a nation are so cippled with mourning our loss of empire we tend to pick on token Americans by way of revenge, we tend to call this kind of banter....erm......well a inept debate I guess?

To quote directly: "I don't agree with it"

My point is simple: like you I share the dream that people aren't defined by their sexuality, in my case the very reason why I feel no need to casually clarify statements with a snide condemnation of the orifices other folk choose to dip their wick.

It's not like a bus load of camp queers are currently parked outside your house, plotting to break in and bum you senseless. I'm sure that your cache of automatic weapons would put the most predatory of gay men off their vinegar stroke?

I'm not suggesting you are a homophobe by any stretch of the imagination, merely that you should supress your urge to tell the world that although you have no problem with homosexuality......you kinda do really....

Im like you - I dont really care if gay people can get married or not. I do think they should have legal rights but I can't help but think there will be a lot of gay couples who suddenly all get married just "because we can now!!!"***

Itll be interesting to see some stats a couple years down the line...





***IdolDroog would like to clarify that by said comment no offense was deliberarely implied to the homosexual community. It was merely a social comment on human beings rathing then an implication that all gay people are reckless, unintelligent, thoughtless people who do not respect the sanctity of marriage.

But what you might have failed to realise ID is that in the US of A marriage has far more reaching implications like tax,social security benefits & parenting rights

Gay couples adopt childrens as well so they should be afforded the same level of protection and benefits that marriage offers otherwise the risk is there of branding people second class citizens

This malarkey that by allowing same sex couples to be legally married
is devaluing marriage is typical of the ideology of the religious

If marriage were really such a great instituition then why does the average marriage only last 7 years

Once again we're drawing the lines in the sand over sexual relations

Something that really shoudn't be anybody elses business

cheers
B....OZ

I won't repeat my opposition to gay adoption/marriage, as you've all heard my reasoning before.
But it's worth mentioning again the potentially fatal confusion of Western governments of whatever political stripe between tolerance, and approbation.
The former is laudable, the latter tendentious and dangerous.

you're addicted to porn if it no longer 'works' and has no effect on you. You have become so accustomed to constantly viewing it that you are immune to it- that clearly must be very problematic if anyone is in such a situation.

Personally I can go days without it and days without knocking one off or having my way with my missus.

However, I can certainly think of worse things to be addicted to- it doesnt do as much harm as say drink, drugs, gambling.

>why does the average marriage only last 7 years

Amazing.

My first marriage was VERY average and only lasted 7 years !

Guilbert