Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Your 'real world' you mean where you decide what I need to be protected from? No thanks.
-
- Posts: 4113
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
JRPornstar wrote:
> My only regret is that it wasn't covered up properly. For the
> good of our nation it should have been, along with other things
> that have probably been covered up over the years.
Welcome to a very slippery slope.
> My only regret is that it wasn't covered up properly. For the
> good of our nation it should have been, along with other things
> that have probably been covered up over the years.
Welcome to a very slippery slope.
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
JRPornstar wrote:
> My only regret is that it wasn't covered up properly.
Dear God in Heaven- is that what you REALLY think?
That's a horrifying statement to make in a so-called democracy.
> My only regret is that it wasn't covered up properly.
Dear God in Heaven- is that what you REALLY think?
That's a horrifying statement to make in a so-called democracy.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
The 'public panic' argument so beloved of oligarchs everywhere....
On the other hand, might not the truth set you free?
On the other hand, might not the truth set you free?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
We get nowhere with abuse.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Indeed.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."