Page 7 of 8

Bukkake obstacles.

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2001 5:49 pm
by Matt
Howdy. Ok, let's take the problems Uncle Ben has thrown up and see what can be done.

1. You need 50 guys who can all wank and come one after the other.

Not much to guarantee this will be ok, you just have to trust that the guys who participate wouldn't do it unless they could cum like that. I have no problems, but then I am 24 and at my peak!

2. They would all [just for the avoidance of doubt as my lawyer the redoubtable Henri says] have to come to London the day before and get tested. There are only 2 clinics and they wouldn't be able to do that big a job I'm sure.

How strict is this 'day before' thing? A 30 minute clinic would be excellent, but a test within the week of doing this would be ok, surely. Especially seeing as Bukkake isn't exactly high risk territory. I understand the point though.

3. They must all wank 3 days before the shoot, and then avoid any strong food, [curries etc] and drink lots of orange juice and eat 3 or 4 sticks of celery a day. I'm not joking, trust me - I'm a pornographer.

Do you mean we should wank 3 days before then not at all? A three day wankless zone? That's the most difficult problem so far. I'm sure we could suffer that for the sake of debauchery.

4. At least 4 other girls would be needed for 'blow job duty'

Are you doubting the power of my hand?!! I'm not sure how necessary that is, but I'm enjoying the thought ;)

5. Security wise, whaere does everyone put their stuff while the shoot's going on?

How much stuff do you think we'll need?

6. Guaranteed some guys will forget their test, even if the clinics could cope.

No test, no show. I'd be strict about this one - the last thing you want to do is put others at risk. I think the test would filter out the people not really serious about it anyway - save us from the lurkers who have come to watch but not do.

7. Controversial one this. Some guys will be, how can I put this... quite exceptionally unnatractive, not just ordinary looking, but basically gross, and will probably not like being told so and then asked to leave!

Sorted in a previous thread.

8. There will need to be shower facilities for all these people just before the start of the shoot.

Depends on the venue, this one - so the problem basically becomes: we need a benue with shower facilities in it. Hmmm. Anyone know anywhere? I'm not sure the local sports hall will have us!

9. There needs to be 2 main girls so they can lick each other's faces while waiting for the next cumblast.

Not essential, I would have thought, but if you (Ben) are intending to film it, then I guess you call the shots here. Mind you, if you're calling the shots, I'm sure you have a number of girls you could call at the same time.

10. There would need to be 3 or 4 cameras shooting simult.. simalun...sitlum... er, at the same time.

Hmmm. Any suggestions?

Looking back, this hasn't really been of any help at all. Oops! Oh well, it's a start.


Matt.

Re: Girls it's over to you !

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2001 11:57 pm
by Rimbaud
Well, everything I said is based on what I've read on JM's site, on iafd.com, rame.net and avn.com, or from reputable US reviewers.

Also, I've seen the first ten American Bukkake films (several times!) and there is very definitely only one camera - you can tell because there is no cutting, just zooming and moving around, so it's pretty clear that there's a single hand-held device. You get wide shots of the room in which the action takes place and you can see there are no fluffers, just a large number of guys keeping themselves, erm, entertained. Apart from these wide-angle shots, the guys' faces and bodies are never on camera, which is fortunate because from what you see of them, you can tell most of them aren't pros.

The one thing I'm not really, absolutely certain about is exactly how they recruit their guys. Although now I come to think of it, I think I recall seeing some kind of advert on their site once saying 'do you want to be in American Bukkake'...couldn't swear to it.

Re: Health hazards

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2001 11:59 pm
by Rimbaud
Sounds grim, if I were an agent or producer at a bukkake flick I would definitely advise the girls not to accept any guys who hadn't had checks.

Re: How's about...

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 12:01 am
by Rimbaud
2000 men? I take it we're talking total career liaisons, here, and not a single gang-bang? Who currently holds the latter record, anyway? Seems to change every five minutes.

Re: How's about...

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 12:04 am
by Rimbaud
Son, you are one dirty bugger, and that I admire, but you have no respect for tradition ;-)

The girls don't wank the guys off in bukkake. And the cum has got to hit the face. Those are the rules brother!!! Still, I like your bowl of jizz idea. If Sarah was up for it, she could collect the facial runoff in a bowl. Guys who had some left to give after their first pop could then make their second donation directly into the pot, which pour game girl could then quaff.

Re: I LOVE TERESA MAY!!!!

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 12:09 am
by Rimbaud
She's not a bad looking girl. Filthy, too, but that goes without saying :-)

Re: Attn Ben and others - British Bukkake

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 12:43 am
by Rimbaud
agreed, loads of amateurs use it, it makes them horny but not always able to perform.

Re: British Bukkake ????

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 3:22 am
by Rimbaud
Fair do's. I'm only referring to US GABP (generally accepted bukkake practice) because that is the starting point - we are of course going to better the tawdry yank (by being less ugly for starters) but it makes a useful reference point.

Re: How's about...

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 9:05 am
by alec
We are talking about a single gang bang, admittedly held over two days, released in the video (2 VHS tapes) Gang Bang 2000 and filmed just before the year 2000. She appeared on Jerry Springer and 'discussed' it. It's been reviewed by the likes of Roger T. Pipe.

Re: How's about...

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2001 12:27 pm
by woodgnome
as someone pointed out on that show, plain mathematics make that figure hard to, er, swallow!

48hrs X 60mins = 2,880mins
2,880mins X 60sec(x)s = 172,800secs
172,800secs ? 2000 = 86secs

so, sabrina would have needed to shag a bloke every 86 seconds, over a period of two whole days, without sleep (i suppose she *could* have slept through some of them!) or going to the bathroom (i suppose she could have skipped that too although, eeugh!)

it all seems a bit unlikely, me thinks. let's face it, most blokes can't last 86 seconds!!