Page 7 of 7
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:49 pm
by jj
Facts are by definition 'true'.
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:56 pm
by jj
The fundamental difference, I have always supposed and hoped,
between the apparently-democratic West and those areas of the
World where freedom of speech is banned, is that we are genuinely
accountable and thereby occupy the moral high-ground.
For us to adopt similar tactics to terrorists, who are essentially
utterly childish in approach [i.e. "gimme what I want, NOW!! Or
I'll throw a tantrum"] and completely lacking in political sophistication
is simultaneously humanly understandable and horribly, horribly
wrong.
Re: Barrister's shooting considered by CPS
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:57 pm
by jj
Pathetic.