Page 7 of 15

Re: Crome & goggles

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:36 pm
by steve56
how does she keep them on?,or how did i stop from coming

Re: Dililema

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:37 pm
by Wendy
I am in total agreement with Angel on this subject. I am in a fortunate position of not having to rely on porn for my main income so have never felt compelled to go down the personally unacceptable route of Bukkake, escorting etc. I don't want to belittle the girls that I know are doing this as I also know that they take every precaution possible and making a living purely from pubished Brit Porn is nigh on impossible nowadays. I would also like to add that Angel's decision to post this as a partial reason for not attending the BGAFD party should not let you come to the conclusion that all of us girlies are involved in such high risk activities. I have mailed her and asked her to reconsider as I know you would all like to have the chance of meeting her.

Wendy XXX

Re: Dililema

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:40 pm
by steve56
well said wendy.

Re: Dililema

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:55 pm
by Darkow
Wendy, great input into what really ought to be a very serious discussion.

Angel is completely right to bring up this topic and it's good to see that professionals like you recognise the need to seriously address the major league risk elements that she's highlighted.

Wendy, you're very lucky not to have to rely on porn for a major portion of your income. Sadly, the vast majority don't have that luxury. Very few of them can hope to encash a little known name by way of website, which no doubt, you and only a few others can.

So what happens? Corners start getting cut and bk's and gb's become desperate alternatives. And down that route goes unacceptably high risk as Angel, and others, have so properly pointed out in this thread.

No one has an answer. Those of us whose money is part of the huge revenue base of porn sometimes ask the question: is it right to patronise what might lead to fatal infections? We try to rationalise it by saying well we don't patronise snuff/scat/extreme sm etc etc. But, deep inside, we know there's a weakness in this argument and sadly/strangely/unavoidably, the desire for sexual arousal by audiovisual pornograpy is often overwhelming.

People say, better you wank than going out and raping some poor woman. Thing is, those of us who watch porn don't consider it an alternative to rape. I can safely say if I don't watch porn, I'm unlikely to hit the streets looking to violate a woman.

What I might do, Wendy, and this is an important point, is to seek an episode with a prostitue/escort/masseuse. That's why I think it might not be accurate to lump escorting with bk's and gb's. Carefully done and managed, escorting might just be the safer way to supplement income for those girls who aren't Wendy-type superstars. Of course, there is the alternative that Angel is clearly considering which is to get out of the biz entirely.

Irrespective, no doubt, we all wish Angel well, as we do you, Wendy, as well, mainly because, and not only, your imagery and sexual exploits on screen have been a source of intense sexual pleasure for many.

We need not proselytise. Just think carefully as we reach for the lube, seated in front of the flickering screen.......

Re: Dililema

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 3:36 pm
by Wendy
I take your point Darkow, I'm only saying that escorting isn't for me. I have good friends that do it and make a good living from it I only implied (I hope)that their paramount concern was one of their own health. I do porn because I enjoy the idea of guys wanking over me via video or TV. That's just me.

I don't think you need to lose any sleep over the porn/rape argument. Rape has in many studies been proved to be an issue of power not sex. It has been an erroneous argument used by the anti - porn brigade for a very long time.

Wendy XXX

Re: Dililema

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 4:11 pm
by Darkow
Again, thanks Wendy for the insight.

Please don't misunderstand me. I fully respect your viewpoint as to whether or not to do the escorting thing and I believe in your maturity sufficiently to believe you know what's best for you. The admirable thing about people like you is that you also strive for what's best for your colleagues in the biz and I wish you more power.

You're wholly correct on the anti-porn cynical exploitation of the rape/porn issue.

(Incidentally, after all is said and done, you and your crazy Housewives Fantasy, OEJ Amateur and Dick Nasty Hershe Highways continue to be at the very top of my self-gratification menu!! So, there!)

Re: Dililema

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 4:17 pm
by P Mc Cartney
Fine..
Suiits me.
About time, too.........

Re: Crome & goggles

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 4:25 pm
by (fyrfyter) John
The point I'm making is - it's a trade off... no, its not sexy - but where is the respect for the girls and what about the responsibility to protect the integrity of the cert...

What you lads are suggesting is - "bugger the risk, it's got to be aesthetically pleasing" - that reflects very badly on you... you should be suitably ashamed by your attitudes.

I'd say this...

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 4:36 pm
by (fyrfyter) John
I think Angel is maybe in turmoil over this issue... maybe BGAFD3 is coming a week or so too early...

But personally, I think if she can gather her composure it would be nice for her to attend...

This subject has been discussed many times before - ALMOST IDENTICAL POSTS just 6 months ago - buut as none of the posts came from girls in the industry - it all fell by the wayside.

Angel has raised awareness of this subject in such a way that GIRLS ARE TAKING NOTICE.

Angel - if the composure is there - GO! You have done a great thing with this thread... go reap the benefits and contibue your crusade in person!

Re: Crome & goggles

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 4:36 pm
by Ace
Hit the nail on the head there mate, irrespective of the health issues, just WHERE is the respect for the (poor) lady involved? Whatever anybodies 'thing' remember, show the lady the utmost respect. She deserves NOTHING less.