egafd.com

Yes Holden I can say you have definately won me over with all your facts and pictures, seems like an edition of ?Watch with Mother?, just seems you cannot answer the basic questions though that might support your theory or do you just gloss over the facts and stick to the truths as you see fit:

I would not say that the pictures on the website are the pictures taken by the photographer on that documentary, still I think you can clearly see the wreckage no matter how small of an aeroplane, you cannot answer me what wreckage was found of those aeroplanes that flew into the twin towers, as I would imagine that would be the only thing you could judge as being the benchmark for wreckage of planes being flown full speed into buildings, of course unless you have more knowledge than me!!
And if it wasn?t that flight that crashed into the Pentagon, what do you reckon it was and why do you reckon it was covered up??
Or are you going to derail most of the questions with the ?missing the point? quote again??

ps Magoo thanks for the kind words about the sheep, you were right she was a corker, I have sent her your forwarding address ...

Got to agree with you on this one Holden. Steve56 always manages to bring every topic around to some trivial item about pop music/TV/what he did in July 1983.
Please steve56 try to restrain yourself. There are things going on in the world that are more important than your recollections.

Mart

Just though I would mention for anybody interested THAT documentary is being repeated late Sunday night 3.05 on channel 4.

Thanks for that, Crofter---missed it first time around.