Page 8 of 10
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:03 am
by Kramer
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Trumpton is one of the finer minds here,
Ha ha, only on the internet can this annoying prick be considered a "finer mind".
This seriously makes me wonder about you Warren if you come on a forum such as this to admire people with superior intellect. Not that Trumpton has any intellect mind you, I've discovered hemoroids with more intelligence than this guy. But yeah, I guess it does bother me, in the sense that he annoys the fuck out of me. I'd just like to be able to post my "inane" comments without him feeling the need to try and take the piss (try mind you as this guys comments are about as funny as a fart in a phonebox) out of them. If this is Curb Your Enthusiasm then I guess that'd make me Larry David and Trumpton the rest of the world that is the irritation to my life.
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:58 pm
by Trumpton
Kramer wrote:
> But yeah, I
> guess it does bother me, in the sense that he annoys the fuck
> out of me.
I'm glad to be of service !thumbsup!
I'd just like to be able to post my "inane" comments
> without him feeling the need to try and take the piss
You admit to posting inane comments, and you are the undoubted supreme master of this activity, then you warrant, indeed demand that 'the piss being taken'!
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:27 pm
by Kramer
Inane yes, but no less inane than your own comments, or anyone elses on this forum. That's what this forum is for really, it's not a place to discuss serious topics (not often anyway) it's to have a bit of fun or share information/pics with each other. You seem to jump on peoples threads and post your tiresome unfunny insults at them, taking the piss out of people for using this forum for what it is intended for.
Let's just look at the title one of your, not inane in the slightest threads shall we:
I bought the Sunday Sport today!
"erm yeah thanks for letting us know, also prey tell how many times did you: have a shit today? take a sip of water? scratch your head? contemplate suicide? Please don't bother us with useless pieces of information."
Oh look I made a funny little comment too, aren't I precious. I bet everyone on this forum will think I'm just hilarious the way I can point out the bleedin obvious and make it into a painfully unfunny little comment. I feel so good about myself now that I've taken the piss out of someones inane thread I think I'll go off and have a wank now whilst looking at myself in the mirror.
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:05 pm
by Trumpton
Kramer wrote:
> Inane yes, but no less inane than your own comments, or anyone
> elses on this forum.
I doubt very much if you know what the word 'inane' means?
That's what this forum is for really, it's
> not a place to discuss serious topics (not often anyway) it's
> to have a bit of fun
Yes, at the expense of inane comments made by you and your 'brothers in arms'!
or share information/pics with each other.
That's what you'd dearly love this forum to become! You post something about a "babe" you've seen on Babeblahblah and you want US to find out details about it! We're not your servants!!!!! You're just too lazy and bone idle to find the information yourself!!!
> You seem to jump on peoples threads and post your tiresome
> unfunny insults at them, taking the piss out of people for
> using this forum for what it is intended for.
Your the only one who wants me to "insult" them! If we let the likes of you control this forum for your sole intention, then it would be dominated by your mind numbingly fatuous, tiresome and steadfast boring posts!!
> Let's just look at the title one of your, not inane in the
> slightest threads shall we:
>
> I bought the Sunday Sport today!
The ironic subtily of my post has clearly pass way over your low-brow forehead!!
This is not a little girls playground where we are all treated with kid gloves! If you don't enjoy the robust nature of postings here then I suggest you get your nan to wipe away those tears and visit a forum where your cretinous posts will be appreciated!!
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:53 pm
by Kramer
>You post something about a "babe" you've seen on Babeblahblah and >you want US to find out details about it! We're not your servants!!!!! >You're just too lazy and bone idle to find the information yourself!!!
This forum is supposed to be about an exchange of ideas and information. I only post questions about girls if I have looked and can't find any or little information on them. This is a site dedicated to British Girls in the Adult Industry and therefore has many fans of these girls on the threads. Don't you think the best place to ask info on Girls working in the Adult Industry would be on a forum such as this??? Hmm maybe, in fact lets see what the site says about this itself:
"All relevant information we have is here on the site, so please don't ask for anything additional since we don't have it! (try the message forum). If you are looking for specific videos, try the suppliers listed in the links/videos section first."
"Try the message forum" Is this encouraging us to use the sites forum to find out information on girls??? Surely not when Lord of the BGAFD O/T forums strongly discourages this. Could it be that when the site itself encourages to do what I and my 'brothers in arms' have been doing that perhaps you have absoloutely nothing to complain about... Hmm I wonder.
>The ironic subtily of my post has clearly pass way over your low-brow forehead!!
Yes your far too high brow for the likes of me. It makes me laugh that a person who has been posting on a forum about British Porn for as long as you have has the nerve to accuse anyone else of being low-brow. We all know how high brow pornography is don't we. Hey I post here too so I'm not knocking the site, but seriously when I'm posting on these sorts of sites being high or low brow doesn't even come into it.
And wow yeah, that thread of yours is certainly steeped in irony. You basically described the entire contents of the Sunday Sport (again what a high brow newspaper), ok I'll give you a point for observational comedy (I use the term comedy very loosely) but the fact that you seem to be trying to take credit for posting something satirical is I'm afraid reaching a bit my friend. It's kind of sad that you think any of your postings on this (let's face it) slightly pervy thread have any comedic or intellectual worth.
>This is not a little girls playground where we are all treated with kid >gloves! If you don't enjoy the robust nature of postings here then I >suggest you get your nan to wipe away those tears and visit a forum >where your cretinous posts will be appreciated!!
Again with the inane childish insults.
>cretinous posts
If you feel this way about my threads then why reply to them at all? indeed if you feel my threads are boring and inane, for goodness sakes man stay out of them, I didn't ask you to post in them. Make your own threads to make fun of them if it makes you feel happy and I'll be sure not to read them, you just seem a little obsessed with my postings that's all. But let's just finish this once and for all. Please grant me this one favour, if you see a thread with my name as the Author then please, please, please stay the fuck out. In return I'll do the same with yours. Ok. Right now fuck off out my thread. Everyone else is welcome by the way.
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:37 pm
by Sam Slater
I think some of us are just fed up of the the babecast/station/whatever type posts, and requests for pics/links/info about certain girls.
The posts are basically the same, repetitive tripe; the only difference being the name of the poster.
Having said all this, these types of posts are in in this forum because they're off topic, and within the FAQs so we have to deal with it.
Please don't see us as impolite beasts Kramer, but merely fed up.
I guess if I made a post about how much I enjoy bananas, it wouldn't be against the FAQs if I posted it in the OT forum. If Caractacus then repeated my enjoyment of bananas through a post of his own, and then Fudgey, and then Jacques, and then Trumpton, and then TBT, and then Wazza, and then Lizard, and so on, month after month, year after year, certain forumites would be pig-sick of 'banana posts' with certain people becoming sarcastic.
I hope you get the idea.
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:30 pm
by Trumpton
1. Seeking information.
This is a place to ascertain information about models. However, you want to take the "seeking" to an altogether different and creepier level! Your continual requests about models, or to use your definition "babes", does become somewhat pernicious and more than a little sinister! What do you hope to achieve by this constant bombardment of your distinctly odd views about the women, or again to use your definition "babes", who you seem to gushingly salivate over at the mere sight of them?
2. Obsessive behaviour.
As I have previously intimated your behaviour in regards to your weird compunction to, at all costs, find pictures, links etc, does, I suggest, go beyond the normal bounds of acceptable behaviour! Perhaps you are afflicted by an inherant obsessive disorder? Moreover, I have detected in your railings against me the fact that I have touched on a bare and open emotional wound. This shows itself when you have been satirised or criticised. You believe that you are beyond all reproach and in a dangerous mixture of breath-taking arrogance and pig-ignorance you demand that your twisted views should cut a swath through this forum with total impunity!!
Here's some advice which you might find useful:
a), attempt to hold a cogent argument
b), avoid obvious hypocrisy
c), if you are prepared to dish out satire and criticism, then be prepared to receive it back.
I shall continue to use these forums to air my views in what ever manner I wish. I refuse to be dictated to by you about where I should place my posts. If I believe any post on any thread warrant's my comments I shall offer them without fear or favour!!
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:38 am
by beutelwolf
Kramer wrote:
> This is a
> site dedicated to British Girls in the Adult Industry and
> therefore has many fans of these girls on the threads.
Actually, the O/T forum is shared with EGAFD, so it's all-European, not just British.
Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:19 am
by Kramer
Sam Slater wrote:
> I think some of us are just fed up of the the
> babecast/station/whatever type posts, and requests for
> pics/links/info about certain girls.
>
> The posts are basically the same, repetitive tripe; the only
> difference being the name of the poster.
>
> Having said all this, these types of posts are in in this forum
> because they're off topic, and within the FAQs so we have to
> deal with it.
>
> Please don't see us as impolite beasts Kramer, but merely fed
> up.
>
> I guess if I made a post about how much I enjoy bananas, it
> wouldn't be against the FAQs if I posted it in the OT forum. If
> Caractacus then repeated my enjoyment of bananas through a post
> of his own, and then Fudgey, and then Jacques, and then
> Trumpton, and then TBT, and then Wazza, and then Lizard, and so
> on, month after month, year after year, certain forumites would
> be pig-sick of 'banana posts' with certain people becoming
> sarcastic.
>
> I hope you get the idea.
>
>
Yeah, I see where your coming from and to be honest I've only ever posted a couple of requests for babes on these channels, I don't do it all the time, but I guess there are people who do make a habit of it, sure. My advice is just ignore these threads, no one is forcing anyone to read or reply to posts if they don't want to.
Anyway thanks Sam Slater it's nice to read a reply to one of my posts that isn't simply a barrage of insults.