Page 9 of 10

Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:53 am
by laralatex
No, i bet anthea turner is not a slut in the bedroom. Judging by her perfect house wife show, she'll probably be shouting at you for wrinkling the sheets whilst you're taking her from behind.


Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:38 pm
by Snake Diamond
Those "Prim 'n Proper Ladies" mostly tend to be right dirty slut's in the bedroom department, lol.


Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:43 pm
by Kramer
Oooh Catptain Pedantic! It's an internet Forum I'm hardly too concerned about my spelling. But yeah fair point Warren but I'm afraid I cannot accept that this guy has a finer mind than anyone, still perhaps I was a bit overly harsh on you and for that I appologise, my beef is with Trumpton not you.

Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:35 pm
by Kramer
Trumpton wrote:

> 1. Seeking information.
>
> This is a place to ascertain information about models.
> However, you want to take the "seeking" to an altogether
> different and creepier level! Your continual requests about
> models, or to use your definition "babes", does become somewhat
> pernicious and more than a little sinister! What do you hope
> to achieve by this constant bombardment of your distinctly odd
> views about the women, or again to use your definition "babes",
> who you seem to gushingly salivate over at the mere sight of
> them?
>

Ok I'm just baffled by this post. "Sinister", where did you get that from? Seriously how have my posts been creepy? All I did was ask if anyone had any further info ie film work or photo shoots on a couple of British performers I'd seen on one of the babe channels. How you got creepy or sinsiter from that perplexes me. Please back up your arguments with evidence, look through all of my posts and point out at which point I came across as sinsiter.

What do you hope
> to achieve by this constant bombardment of your distinctly odd
> views about the women, or again to use your definition "babes",
> who you seem to gushingly salivate over at the mere sight of
> them?

Odd views? Again prey tell what is so odd about being attracted to a sexy female? Sexy females who work in the adult industry no less. Isn't that the point? to be attracted and to salivate over them? Have you forgotten what site you are a member of Trumpton? Don't you watch pornography or have any interest in the girls working in the porn industry? If you don't then what the hell are you doing here? I mean it seems to me that I have the same level of interest in this stuff as pretty much everyone else on this forum so if you are calling me sinister or creepy because of it then your pretty much saying the same for everyone else here including yourself. And I only used the term babe because that is what most of the channels have in common bang babes, babestation, babecast etc etc, so I shortened it to babes so you'd understand what I was talking about; the babe channels.

On a personal note I believe I have a rather healthy interest in pornography. I enjoy it and my girlfriend is fine with that, in fact we occasionally watch pornography together. If I see an actress/performer I particualrly enjoy then I'm keen to see if they have been in any other production I may like, If I can't find any info myself then I post a thread here to see if anyone can help out. That's it! That's all I do, the way your going on you'd think I was stalking these girls and hanging out outside there homes to catch a glimpse.

> 2. Obsessive behaviour.
>
> As I have previously intimated your behaviour in regards to
> your weird compunction to, at all costs, find pictures, links
> etc, does, I suggest, go beyond the normal bounds of acceptable
> behaviour! Perhaps you are afflicted by an inherant obsessive
> disorder? Moreover, I have detected in your railings against
> me the fact that I have touched on a bare and open emotional
> wound. This shows itself when you have been satirised or
> criticised. You believe that you are beyond all reproach and
> in a dangerous mixture of breath-taking arrogance and
> pig-ignorance you demand that your twisted views should cut a
> swath through this forum with total impunity!!

Sounds sort of like you're describing yourself there mate. Seriously, what have I said to suggest I have an obsessive disorder? Really look at my posts, you'll find very little on me asking about the babe channels. If anything it seems that your reflecting your own obsessive disorder onto me. Again look at all the babe channel posts and what do they have in common? Oh yes you've replied to every single one. Now that's an obsession, you just can't let one go by without jumping on it and adding your opinion. You keep saying your sick of these posts yet you carry on replying to them, I've said this before and I'll say it again "If your so sick of these threads then don't bother replying. It's not just these threads either
I simply posted here to see if like me anyone finds Super Nanny attractive, it was a half jokey thread really, a bit of fun. Yet you decided to jump on this post and quickly post your unfunny piss take. Knowbody asked you to, you did it cos you just couldn't help yourself, your obsession if you will. You seem to be obsessed with my threads even though you claim you hate them and have no interest in them. To me that just screams creepy, sinister, obsessive behaviour....In fact....Your not watching me now are you...hang on I'm just going to close the blinds... Urrgh...

> I shall continue to use these forums to air my views in what
> ever manner I wish. I refuse to be dictated to by you about
> where I should place my posts. If I believe any post on any
> thread warrant's my comments I shall offer them without fear or
> favour!!

"dictated to" hmmm seems that's what you're trying to do to this forum, your bullying people into posting the kind of topics you want posted.

If I believe any post on any
> thread warrant's my comments I shall offer them without fear or
> favour!!

Belive me buddy, no post or thread warrant's any of your comments.

Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:55 pm
by Sam Slater
No problem.

I don't think you're an obsessive maniac; just a guy caught up in Trumpton's (and others, inc me) over-zealous sarcasm. You've took offence and snapped back, which has led you both into a never-ending game of tit-for-tat.


Again, I don't think anybody has it in for you; it's just a bit of sarcasm that has -unfortunately- spiralled out of control.

Lets hope it ends soon.......


Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:29 pm
by Kramer
Yeah, your probably right buddy. There's a Trumpton on every forum. In my defence though I haven't been posting here long I'm still a newbie, just thought I'd have a bit more of a welcome than the constant Sarcastic slurs I get to every thread I post. It's totally unprovoked and I've managed to ignore it so far but this time it just annyed me too much and I had to fight back. It's one of those things though isn't it, neither of us want to blink first so we'll just keep posting and posting, it's getting kind of boring too. I'd be happy if we both posted on this forum but just left each other alone. I suggested this to Trumpton but he wasn't having any of it, claiming it was his right to piss take all of my posts. Annoying isn't it?

Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:33 pm
by Lizard
Ignore it Kramer, welcome aboard the rough and tumble, get it off your chest, repeat these words, Trumpton is a Cunt .... and we'll all move on.

regards
Liz.


Re: Super-Sexy-Nanny???

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:55 am
by Kramer
Lizard wrote:

> Ignore it Kramer, welcome aboard the rough and tumble, get it
> off your chest, repeat these words, Trumpton is a Cunt .... and
> we'll all move on.
>
> regards
> Liz.
>
>

Ha ha, thanks Lizard. Trumpton is a cunt. Hey your right I feel better already.