Page 9 of 13

Re: Vote Labour ...for the sake of the country !

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:13 pm
by Sam Slater
[quote]Well just to get a few facts straight: John Major won an internal leadership contest,[/quote]

So? No one's challenged Brown's position as leader, as they are allowed to do. And anyway, Major fell short in that 2nd round of voting and only got into power due to Heseltine and Hurd's withdrawals.

[quote]Major then held an election some 15 months after becoming PM, which of course he won.[/quote]

Now, now. You're being a little disingenuous again here. He didn't call the election out of some moralistic gesture. The Conservative's term in office was up in June that year so holding the election 8 weeks early means nothing. And that makes it nearly 17 months if you're going to bring it to that.

[quote]Let's remember that the Labour voters of 2005 (stupidly I guess) took Tony Blair at his word when he said he would serve a FULL THIRD TERM !![/quote]

And let's remember constant public/media pressure asking him to go, and then when he does there's outrage that he changed his mind.

And while we're on the subject of changes of heart, here's a few from Old Maggie:

12th Nov, 1990: "I am still at the crease, though the bowling has been pretty hostile of late. And in case anyone doubted it, can I assure you there will be no ducking the bouncers, no stonewalling, no playing for time. The bowling's going to get hit all round the ground. That is my style."

20th Nov, 1990: "I fight on; I fight to win." (after first round of leadership challenge).

22nd Nov, 1990: "Fuck this, I'm off!" (Ok, NOW I'm being disingenuous!).

Blair took 2 years to go back on his word. Maggie just 2 days.

The facts are that Major came into power when his party was already in power, like Brown, and that Brown is the unchallenged leader of the Labour party. All above board and all legal. If you don't like that then vote to change the system.


Re: Vote Labour ...for the sake of the country !

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:36 pm
by Sam Slater
All conjecture I'm afraid. Can you back any of that up?


Re: Vote Labour ...for the sake of the country !

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:52 am
by randyandy
I've been trying to find the Tory alternative before the shit hit the fan but can't got any links?

Could it be that had Brown not bottled calling for an election and the crisis not happened until after the Tories got in You would be ranting about Cameron or was green Dave's plan to change they system in place immediately?

By immediately I mean way back when it happened and not as a result of the media frenzies that exist now.

Re: Vote Labour ...for the sake of the country !

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:57 am
by randyandy
JRPornstar wrote:

> You still haven't answered my question... Which is a typical
> lefty, good for fuck all, useless, pathetic normal response
> from a fuck good for society somebody as you are. I await your
> response with baited breath...


Your really are a brain dead prick aren't you.

I tire of morons very easily and have better things to do now so I'll go back to my post about when I want a comment from an arse I'll fart.

If you type another reply have fun because I won't be bothering!

Re: Vote Labour ...for the sake of the country !

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:50 am
by Sam Slater
And so your very first sentence in this debate comes back to show that you're being biased and hypocritical. I knew it wouldn't be long.


[quote]BSH wrote: There's no point arguing about what MIGHT have happened if x y or z had been in power.[/quote]

So, which is it? Can we drag up hypothetical scenarios or not? Only when it puts the Tories in a good light, yes?


Re: Vote Labour ...for the sake of the country !

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:56 am
by randyandy
hypothetical? Yes rubbish? No

Did you find any link about anything by the Tories related to the banks?

Could just be the brown stuff hitting the fan was going to happen, it's happened now and still would have done with the great Green Dave in charge.

Out of interest why has my Tory council who so wisely invested in Icelandic banks cut support for groups supporting the most vulnerable like the woman's refuge and support for the homeless, while increasing taxes at the same time. The same council who spent 1000's on new robes for the mayor.

Doesn't way up with Green Dave's help for families etc media gimmicks.

When you've tackled that little nugget can you let me know why crime has also gone up since they have gained control of our council?

Could I also ask if you think their latest gem to install pink lights in areas to show up teenage spots and in turn make kids not want to cause trouble be a solution to anti-social behaviour?