Page 1 of 1

FS: 21x Lot of Videos (UK Amateurs mostly) & more

Posted: Tue May 18, 2004 8:51 pm
by atticstasher
I hope this posting complies with the regulations, and apologies again if I get it wrong again!

I'm clearing out my stuff - moving abroad - and I want to get rid of 3 large lots of adult videos, mostly mixtures of US and UK porn... This lot #3 is for 21 VHS PAL videos, mostly UK amateur videos that I collected from early 90s to late 90s (before DVD came about), and have been kept in the attic ever since I got married (wife still doesn't know about them!). If you're interested in the other 2 lots - Lot 2 is 31 videos (US&UK Porn) and Lot 1 is 42 videos (US&UK Porn) please contact me.

Please email me for a list of the titles in this Lot #3 but there are videos that I purchased by mail order from Amanda Charles Film, Paula Markham Videos, Your Choice, NCV, Lucy Gresty, Vicky Howard Videos, Rosemary Ravell Videos, Profoto, and Insight Studios. These are solo and boy/girl videos featuring British Amateur Girls. Most of the stars in here are probably not working anymore, so these are more for porn aficionados and collectors who are interested in mostly wholesome and rare British (natural breasts) porn stars!

These are not 'copies' in the sense that I copied them from someone/somewhere else; these are purchased from the above companies at about 10-15 pounds per video and I'm selling these. They are in excellent condition and most tapes are at least 60 mins or more.

Postage will be by standard parcels and at cost. I accept paypal payments but prefer fastpay payments.

Price for the lot of 21 Videos: 75 pounds excluding postage which shouldn't cost more than 10 pounds (exact postage cost will be known once I've weight the lot). Considering that I paid over 200 pounds for the lot, this is a bargain!

Email me at shrill1980@hotmail.com for more details, and thanks for your time...!

Atticstasher


Re: FS: 21x Lot of Videos (UK Amateurs mostly) & more

Posted: Wed May 19, 2004 11:48 am
by woodgnome
this is absolutely fine. and it's always nice to get a response from someone who doesn't equate enforcing the faq with an infringement of their human rights.