egafd.com

You guys in the buiness should contact these two girls, they state in their profile that they'd to erotic ( hopefully porn ) so give them a buzz. there are also a lot of hot girls on here. check them all out








( how to u make these links clickable, its pissing me off )

Joe
It might be a good idea if you and any "guys in the business" check the age of the model in the first link you provide. An appearance on the Sex Offenders Register for the next decade is not at the top of most people's must do activities.
David

Well hopefully it won't be long until shes 18!!

how to make links clickable (which i have done in your post).

Non of the girls on that site *ever* reply.

Nice idea, but useless.

are they all 17?

Apart from her age, there's also the fact that one of 'em doesn?t appear to have a body, or at least, the feminine shape of a mature woman - the shape of which is an essential prerequisite in stimulating (normal) male sexual desire. I mean, 30B-24-24? Where are her tits and hips? She's got all the womanly charms of a garden rake. A pretty face and nice hair (commendable in themselves nowadays) might be great for the teen fashion catwalk, but that alone is not enough to arouse the desire of you average (normal) Joe Punter. It's tits and bums that do that. So I don't see a great future for her, or similar, in the sex and glamour biz.


Officer Dibble

Thanks for that woodgnome & to officer dibble, well its what ever floats ur boats mate, we all have different tastes, thats y there are so many different types of girls on here. for example i think girls like vicky powell & mckenzie lee are stunning but can't stand cathy barry or bev cocks, u ( or other ) may not agree with me but thats the freedom of choice.

No problem with your freedom of choice, I defend it, so long as that freedom is not abused to choose something to pervy - like underage models, or models that look underage (which amounts to the same thing).

But on the subject of tastes and sexual attraction, have a gander at this -



It?s s an interesting article that seems to confirm what I have always said - that beauty is not necessarily in the eye of the beholder. There is a common template hardwired into the male mind, and it's not cultural or subject to the whims of fashion. Hey, you know, I'm always irritated when I espouse the opinion that a film or type of model is crap, and someone then pops up and says, "You're living in the past. That's the fashion now." Well, so what? It may be the fashion, but is sure as shit ain't erotic or stimulating to the majority of dudes.

Officer Dibble