Hairy 10 Shaved 6 (After Erection Time)
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:27 pm
A big ?thank you? to all of you who posted a preference in my recent and very unofficial straw pole of Shaved v. Unshaved models. Like the Playboy survey I read a few years ago, it seems that 50% of us prefer shaved, and 50% prefer natural.
So what is going on? If 50% of us want to see natural diversity, ladies all different from each other and just how nature intended, then how come 98% of glamour models are offering a one-dimensional product (the fake boobed, waxed, typical Jordon image)? Surely 50% of glamour models should be offering us what we want??? After all, we are paying them, aren?t we???
It's rather like turning up to Wembley expecting to watch a culturally diverse but naturally talented Brazilian team excite you with an array of varied yet unexpectedly mouth-watering skills, and then seeing Wimbledon come out of the tunnel (no offence to any Dons fans here).
Oh well, it just goes to show that everything they teach you in life is rubbish!
"The fundamental principle of positive economics in a capitalist society is that Supply will always meet Demand," said John Maynard Keynes. Clearly not happening here.
"It's a bird's job to look good for us," said the cockney Alfie. Enough said.
?The customer is always right. The consumer is King.? Yeah right. Models are clearly shaving for themselves and telling us to like it or lump it. And like idiots we are pretending to like it, and continue to buy it, cause that?s all there is. It?s about time we voted with our wallets until we get what we want.
And in case that doesn?t work, perhaps we should all SHOUT REALLY LOUDLY and then someone may hear us. In true democratic style, I'm off to scale the walls of Buckingham Palace, punch the lights out of Batman a.k.a. Fathers 4 Justice, and sing to Fiona Bruce on the 6 o'clock news "Once you go hair, you never go bare. Come to my lair, you sexy mare."
Hmmm ? a natural Fiona Bruce ? definitely worth staying in bed for.
So what is going on? If 50% of us want to see natural diversity, ladies all different from each other and just how nature intended, then how come 98% of glamour models are offering a one-dimensional product (the fake boobed, waxed, typical Jordon image)? Surely 50% of glamour models should be offering us what we want??? After all, we are paying them, aren?t we???
It's rather like turning up to Wembley expecting to watch a culturally diverse but naturally talented Brazilian team excite you with an array of varied yet unexpectedly mouth-watering skills, and then seeing Wimbledon come out of the tunnel (no offence to any Dons fans here).
Oh well, it just goes to show that everything they teach you in life is rubbish!
"The fundamental principle of positive economics in a capitalist society is that Supply will always meet Demand," said John Maynard Keynes. Clearly not happening here.
"It's a bird's job to look good for us," said the cockney Alfie. Enough said.
?The customer is always right. The consumer is King.? Yeah right. Models are clearly shaving for themselves and telling us to like it or lump it. And like idiots we are pretending to like it, and continue to buy it, cause that?s all there is. It?s about time we voted with our wallets until we get what we want.
And in case that doesn?t work, perhaps we should all SHOUT REALLY LOUDLY and then someone may hear us. In true democratic style, I'm off to scale the walls of Buckingham Palace, punch the lights out of Batman a.k.a. Fathers 4 Justice, and sing to Fiona Bruce on the 6 o'clock news "Once you go hair, you never go bare. Come to my lair, you sexy mare."
Hmmm ? a natural Fiona Bruce ? definitely worth staying in bed for.