Ermmm... Heres My two-pennys-worth...
For the record, I'm as much against anyone commiting any sexual offences, against anyone, just as much as marcus is... but... well... as an ' amature 'to use your expression... (I personally prefer to use the word 'fan' myself, but thats not the issue)I can see both knobrots point, and alecs too... extremely clearly...
however... Marcuses ???
Look, like me, this guys a fan, and he goes shopping, and sees a flippin pornstar at his local 'tescos'... She looks hot... so he goes home, tells his mates... and then posts "Hey Wow ! Geuss what ??? I just saw so n so! WOW !
OK... then alec deletes the post... (imho, not really nessasery, given the limited detail it contained), however, its deletion is inkeeping with the fourums rules... and alec is mearly making a fair point, that "personal information" being posted... is not welcome... once again, fair play... Knobrot makes a valid follow up... Still, no real problems so far...
Then in a matter of a single post later... Bang ! ! !
Marcus Allen makes his presense felt... and all of a sudden we are talking along the lines of all ' amatuers ' (ie non-indutry-proffesionals...) could well be potential Sex Offenders, in the need of a severe kicking ???
Well, firstly thanks for your support, on behalf of all fans everywhere... But your posting ?
Whats that gotta do with knobrot ?
Come on marcus... defend your posting please...
& yes, i did see the original post.
Dan
Sorry... but i'm really steaming at marcus on this one...
your posting was out of order, and at the very least, totally irrelivant, unless you are casting asspoursions upon another.
Ok, If he had said... i saw her in tesscos, she looked hot... i followed her home, she lives at 32 happy road, happy town, and if you climb the tree in her garden, you can see into her bedroom... well... OK.. then thats different... but he didnt...
I was going to end my rant, by highlighting something that is not only indulged in frequently on this and many other forums, infact, it is a common practise, which you CANNOT DENY, is a MUCH MUCH Worse, MUCH more dangerous... yet, it is still never-ever considered to be in the least bit inappriopriate... but I have decided against it, as if i had done so, then in a way, you could consider me to be advertising it, to those who havnt recognised it yet...
and, hopefully, they never will either...
So marcus... whilst i would ideally like to see your defence of your statement, ON THE FORUM, as was your accusation...
I will also explain the cryptic end to you, (or to alec) if you choose to email me directly.
Sorry but you got to let of a bit of steam now n then

Dan