Page 1 of 1
More on FC
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2001 2:53 pm
by Chanta Rose
Thanks for everyones comments in regards to FC, it's nice to have support. I can't write on this forum exactly what went on that day, the fact is it wouldn't be libelous because it is true BUT I can not prove it which would still leave this site open to legal action. I would like it to be known that I am very responsible with other models. I tell EVERY model I meet NOT to work for them and why, thankfully quite a few take my advice, others don't and have either had a normal working experience there or not. Also when a fan contacts me in regards to the video I did for them I thank them for the compliment but also let the know what the shoot was like in the hope that they won't buy from them anymore. For the most part I think the shoots are now ran professionally (Blaze had no problem), Phil no longer does the filming, this is apparently due to the fact that he is under investigation from the Police...still this could be rumour.
Re: More on FC
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2001 4:12 pm
by joey
It must be said in that case that the finished product is a tribute to your professionalism in the face of an apparently tricky working environment.
I did notice that at one point you give a very disgruntled look to something off-camera, as though someone had said something or walked into the room. At quite an inopportune moment, as I recall. I admit, I've always been curious about that.
One of the odder things about "Fiona"'s videos is that on almost every soundtracked one you can hear what sounds like 3 navvies moving heavy boxes up and down stairs in the background. I used to wonder whether the photographer was conducting an unending house-moving operation, or employed a team of people to rearrange the furniture on a 24/7 basis. I realise now this is just the sound of lawyers carrying their heavy briefs...

Re: More on FC
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2001 9:31 pm
by Potash Mine
...passsing comments about lawyers underpants are we now......
It's not the briefs that are heavy..... its just the load of bollocks inside them.
Lawyers have no morals... how on earth can they lie for people for money.....
And did you know.. that if you spell 'solicitor' incorrectly, then it's an anagram of 'clitoris'..... curious thought.
Cheers....
Potash Mine
Impending DOOM for FC ?
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2001 10:42 pm
by JonnyQ
All these insinuations about FC and police investigations and legal actions and models getting abused...are we safe placing orders with them? From the sound of things around here, they're two seconds away from being shut down. Is it time to begin making funeral arrangements for FC? Should prospective customers hold off on placing orders?
Re: More on FC
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2001 8:00 am
by Aaron Copeland
Potash Mine wrote:
>
> ... And did you know.. that if you spell 'solicitor'
>,incorrectly, then it's an anagram of 'clitoris'..... curious
>thought.
Curious indeed. And I've just discovered something even stranger. If you spell "Jack Straw" incorrectly, it's an angram of "total arsehole". Amazing.
Re: Impending DOOM for FC ?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2001 8:17 am
by todge
Hardly Jonny......
A huge back catalogue is always going to generate a lot of cash.
This will always ensure someones there to fill your order !
The vast majority of buyers are interested in what appears on
screen rather than how it was achieved.
If the product's good the brand will endure in some form, no matter who's at the helm.
Re: Impending DOOM for FC ?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2001 8:34 am
by Pino
FC do not answer customers emails. Perhaps this is due to police investigation.